[ { "document_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001", "media": { "publication_title": "Tabor City Tribune", "time_period": "1946-1991", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1960-11-23", "language": "en", "text": "I list\nlot\nStolen Car Found\nAfter Long Hunt\nIlorry County Police\ncovered a stolen ear\nweek-end but it took\nof hunting to do it.\nThe man who took it for\ngot where he had left it\nand police had to tour a\nlarge part of Dillon county\nbefore he recognized a road\nand said. \"I believe it's\ndown that road.”\nThe car was the property\nof Eva Hovis. Rt. 2. ’’'bor\nCity. Charged with its\nwas a man identified h.v\nlice as James Roberson.\nNegro, who worked for Mrs.\nllovis.\nRoberson was arrested in\nFlorence Saturday evening\nafter allegedly stealing the\nautomobile Thursday night\nbut it was Sunday morning\nbefore the car was located.\nWorking on the case were\nCounty Policemen Buddy\nFowler and Willis Gause.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_eva_hovis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Eva Hovis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL__bor_city", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "’’'bor\nCity" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that the stolen car belonged to Eva Hovis and lists “Rt. 2.’ ‘bor City” as part of its description, but it does not indicate that Eva herself was physically present in that city at any time before the publication date. There is no mention of her traveling there, visiting, or being located in ’’bor City’. The only reference to the location pertains to the car’s address, not to Eva’s presence. Therefore, based on the text alone, we cannot confirm that she was physically present at that location prior to 1960‑11‑23.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document identifies “Eva Hovis” as the owner of a stolen car, but it contains no explicit statement that she was physically present in “bor City.” There are no date references or contextual cues linking her to that location within the 30‑day window ending on 1960‑11‑23. Therefore there is no evidence that Eva Hovis was present at “bor City” during the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_roberson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Roberson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001_Q597842", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q597842", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Florence" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states: “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening after allegedly stealing the automobile Thursday night…”. Being arrested in Florence indicates he was physically present at that location on the day of arrest, which is before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore there is explicit evidence that Roberson was in Florence prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The article states that “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening after allegedly stealing the automobile Thursday night.” However, it does not provide any concrete calendar dates for those days (e.g., a specific month and day). The only date given is the publication date of the document: 1960‑11‑23. Without an explicit date that falls within the 30‑day window from 1960‑10‑24 to 1960‑11‑23, we cannot confirm that Roberson was physically present in Florence during that period. The mention of “Saturday evening” and “Thursday night” is too vague to satisfy the strict presence requirement.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_eva_hovis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Eva Hovis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_rt_2", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Rt. 2" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “the car was the property of Eva Hovis. Rt. 2.” It identifies the vehicle’s ownership and its location, but it does not indicate that Eva herself was physically at Rt. 2 or that she visited there. There is no mention of her presence, travel, or any activity involving her at that road before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore, based on the text alone, we cannot confirm that Eva Hovis was present at Rt. 2 prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “The car was the property of Eva Hovis. Rt. 2.” This indicates ownership, not a physical presence at that location. There is no sentence or phrase in the text that explicitly says Eva Hovis was present at Rt. 2 during any time period, nor does it provide a date associated with such an event. The only dates mentioned are “Saturday evening” and “Thursday night,” referring to James Roberson’s arrest and alleged theft, not to Eva Hovis. Since the required evidence of her presence within the 30‑day window (1960‑10‑24 to 1960‑11‑23) is absent, we cannot confirm that she was physically at Rt. 2 during that period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_eva_hovis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Eva Hovis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001_Q502404", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q502404", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Dillon county" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article reports that a stolen vehicle belonging to Eva Hovis was found in Dillon County, but it does not state that she herself was physically present there at any time before the publication date. The only reference to her is as the owner of the car; there are no statements indicating she visited or was located in Dillon County. Therefore there is no evidence supporting her presence.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that the stolen car belonged to Eva Hovis, but it contains no statement indicating that she herself was physically present in Dillon County during the relevant time window (the 30‑day period ending on 1960‑11‑23). The only reference to “Dillon county” concerns the police search for the thief’s vehicle, not Eva’s presence. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that Eva Hovis was in Dillon County within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_james_roberson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "James Roberson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL__bor_city", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "’’'bor\nCity" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document reports that James Roberson “was arrested in Florence Saturday evening” after allegedly stealing the car. It does not state or imply any visit to, or presence at, “’’bor City.” The only location associated with Roberson is Florence; there is no mention of him being in ’’bor City before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore there is no evidence that he was physically present at that location prior to the document’s date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text reports that “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening,” indicating his location at the time of arrest was Florence, not “’'bor City.” There is no statement or contextual clue linking James Roberson to being present in ‘’'bor City within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Consequently, there is no evidence that he was physically present at that location during the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_mrs_llovis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mrs.\nllovis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL__bor_city", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "’’'bor\nCity" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document identifies “’'bor City” as the location of a stolen car that belongs to Eva Hovis. It does not state that Mrs. llovis herself visited or was physically present in that city; it merely notes the property’s ownership and the car’s presence there. No other sentences mention her being at ’'bor City, nor any activity indicating her physical presence. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that she was physically present at that location before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document identifies “Mrs. llovis” as the owner of a car located in ’’bor City, but it does not contain any explicit statement that she was physically present at that location within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1960‑11‑23). The text only notes her property and the location name; there is no mention of her being there or a time reference linking her presence to the required period. Therefore, we cannot confirm her presence at ’’bor City during that window.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_james_roberson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "James Roberson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_rt_2", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Rt. 2" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that the stolen car is “the property of Eva Hovis. Rt. 2.” This indicates the location of the vehicle, not James Roberson’s presence there. Later it reports that “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening after allegedly stealing the automobile Thursday night,” showing he was detained elsewhere. No part of the text mentions James Roberson being at or visiting Rt. 2 before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore, there is no evidence supporting his physical presence at that location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text mentions “Rt. 2” only in the context of a car’s address (“the car was the property of Eva Hovis. Rt. 2”), with no indication that James Roberson was physically present there. The only reference to James Roberson is his arrest in Florence, which does not involve Rt. 2 or any date within the 30‑day window (1960‑10‑24 to 1960‑11‑23). Since no explicit statement places him at that location during the required timeframe, we cannot confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_mrs_llovis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mrs.\nllovis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_rt_2", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Rt. 2" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “the car was the property of Eva Hovis, Rt. 2.” This indicates that the vehicle is located on Route 2 and belongs to Mrs. llovis, but it does not provide any explicit statement or implication that she herself was physically present at that location. There are no references to her being in Rt. 2, attending a meeting there, or visiting the area. The only mention of “Rt. 2” is tied to the car’s property, not to Mrs. llovis’s presence. Therefore, based on the text alone, we cannot confirm that she was at Rt. 2 before the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “The car was the property of Eva Hovis. Rt. 2.’’” This indicates ownership and a location reference, but it does not contain any explicit statement that Mrs. llovis (or Eva Hovis) was physically present at Rt. 2 during the relevant time window. No date or temporal cue is provided linking her presence to Rt. 2 within 30 days before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore, there is no direct evidence that she was present at the specified location in the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_mrs_llovis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mrs.\nllovis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001_Q597842", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q597842", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Florence" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “Negro, who worked for Mrs. llovis.” This indicates that James Roberson (the man identified as the thief) is employed by Mrs. llovis, but it provides no information about Mrs. llovis’s own presence or activities in Florence. The only mention of Florence is that Roberson was arrested there on Saturday evening; there is no indication that Mrs. llovis visited or was present at that location before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore, there is no evidence supporting her physical presence in Florence prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “Mrs. llovis” is mentioned as the employer or relative of James Roberson (“Negro, who worked for Mrs. llovis”), but it does not say she was in Florence. The only mention of Florence is that Roberson was arrested there on Saturday evening; no sentence links Mrs. llovis to that location or to any date within the 30‑day window before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore, there is no explicit evidence in the text that Mrs. llovis was physically present in Florence during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_roberson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Roberson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL__bor_city", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "’’'bor\nCity" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document reports that James Roberson was arrested in Florence, not in “’’bor City”. No sentence or clause indicates his presence at the location “’’bor City” before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore there is no evidence supporting his physical presence at that place.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that James Roberson “was arrested in Florence Saturday evening” after allegedly stealing a car. There is no mention of Roberson being present at or in the location “’'bor City” during any time period, let alone within the 30‑day window ending on 1960‑11‑23 (i.e., from 1960‑10‑24 to 1960‑11‑23). The only reference to “’'bor City” appears in a fragment that does not link it to Roberson’s presence. Therefore, there is no explicit evidence that Roberson was physically present at that location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_roberson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Roberson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_rt_2", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Rt. 2" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document identifies “Rt. 2” only in the context of describing the stolen car’s ownership (“The car was the property of Eva Hovis. Rt. 2.”) and does not state that James Roberson visited or was present at that location. The narrative reports his arrest in Florence, with no mention of him being on or near Rt. 2 before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore there is no textual evidence linking Roberson to Rt. 2 prior to the document’s release.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that the stolen car belongs to Eva Hovis “Rt. 2,” but it does not say that James Roberson was physically at Rt. 2. The only mention of Roberson is that he was arrested in Florence after allegedly stealing the car on Thursday night; there is no reference to him being present at or near Rt. 2 during the relevant time window (1960‑10‑24 to 1960‑11‑23). Therefore, there is no explicit evidence that Roberson was physically present at Rt. 2 within the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_james_roberson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "James Roberson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001_Q597842", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q597842", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Florence" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening after allegedly stealing the automobile Thursday night.” This indicates that James Roberson was physically present in Florence on a Saturday, which is prior to the document’s publication date of 1960‑11‑23 (the Saturday would be 1960‑11‑21). The arrest itself confirms his presence at the location. Therefore there is direct evidence that he was in Florence before the article was published.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The article reports that “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening.” The document’s publication date is given as 1960‑11‑23 (a Sunday). The preceding Saturday would be 1960‑11‑22, which falls within the 30‑day window from 1960‑10‑24 to 1960‑11‑23. Thus the text explicitly states that James Roberson was physically present in Florence during this period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_eva_hovis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Eva Hovis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001_Q597842", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q597842", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Florence" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening” and that he allegedly stole the automobile on Thursday night. There is no indication that Eva Hovis herself was present in Florence; she is only identified as the owner of the stolen car. Since there is no evidence that Eva was physically in Florence before the publication date, we conclude that she was not present at that location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that James Roberson was arrested in Florence on a Saturday evening, but it contains no statement indicating that Eva Hovis was present at that location or any other mention of her being there within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1960‑10‑24 to 1960‑11‑23). Since the text provides no evidence of Eva’s presence in Florence during that period, we cannot confirm it. Therefore the correct classification is FALSE.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_roberson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Roberson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001_Q502404", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q502404", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Dillon county" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article reports that “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening after allegedly stealing the automobile Thursday night.” Florence is a city located within Dillon County, so his arrest there indicates physical presence at that location. Additionally, earlier in the text it notes that “police had to tour a large part of Dillon county before he recognized a road,” implying Roberson himself was traveling through or present in Dillon County during that period. Both statements place him physically in Dillon County prior to the document’s publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore there is clear evidence that Roberson was at Dillon County before the article was published.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that “Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening…” It does not mention any presence of Roberson in Dillon County, nor does it provide a date that falls within the 30‑day window ending on 1960‑11‑23. The only reference to Dillon County concerns police activity (“police had to tour a large part of Dillon county”), which is unrelated to Roberson’s presence. Therefore there is no explicit evidence in the text that Roberson was physically present in Dillon County during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_county_policemen_buddy_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "County Policemen Buddy\nFowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001_Q597842", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q597842", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Florence" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “Working on the case were County Policemen Buddy Fowler and Willis Gause.” This indicates that Buddy was involved in the investigation, but it does not specify that he was physically present at Florence. The only mention of Florence is that James Roberson was arrested there; there is no explicit statement that Buddy was in Florence at any time before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore, based on the text alone, we cannot confirm his presence at that location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “Working on the case were County Policemen Buddy Fowler and Willis Gause.” It does not specify a location or a date associated with Buddy’s presence. The only mention of Florence in the text is regarding James Roberson’s arrest (“Roberson was arrested in Florence Saturday evening”), which does not indicate Buddy’s presence there. Since no explicit evidence places Buddy Fowler in Florence within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (Oct 24 – Nov 23, 1960), we cannot confirm his physical presence at that location during that period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001-NIL_mrs_llovis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mrs.\nllovis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-11-23-a-i0001_Q502404", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q502404", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Dillon county" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The text identifies Mrs. llovis only in the phrase “Negro, who worked for Mrs. llovis,” indicating that she is an employer but providing no information about her physical presence or travel to Dillon County. The location of interest (Dillon County) appears in reference to the stolen car and the arrest of James Roberson, but there is no statement that Mrs. llovis herself was present at that site before the document’s publication date (1960‑11‑23). Since the text contains no evidence of her being physically in Dillon County prior to 1960‑11‑23, we conclude that she was not there.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document mentions “Mrs. llovis” only as a person whose employee is described (“Negro, who worked for Mrs. llovis”). It does not state that she was physically present in Dillon County, nor does it provide any date or time reference linking her presence to the location. The text contains no explicit mention of Mrs. llovis being in Dillon County within the 30‑day window before the publication date (1960‑11‑23). Therefore there is no evidence that she was present at the specified location during that period.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn88068010-1890-04-10-a-i0003", "media": { "publication_title": "Chariton Courier", "time_period": "1878-2025", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1890-04-10", "language": "en", "text": "Judge Burgess.\nThe 3t. Louis Republic bas the\nfollowing to say in regard to Judge\nB urgess:\n“Judge G. D. Burgess, of Lin-\nneus, Mo., candidate for the Demo\ncratic nomination for judge of the\nsupreme court, has been in the city\nfor two days past shaking hands\nwith the local politicians. Judge\nBurgess is not a stranger to the pol\niticians of Missouri. He has made\ntwo good races for the nomination\nof his party convention, and each\ntime was defeated by a small vote.\nHe is very confi lent that he will he\nsuccessful. He is a Kentuckian by\nbirth and has the distinction of pre\nsiding over the circuit courts ot\na district in this state that has a Re\npublican majority of over 1,500. He\nbas three years yet to serve on the\ncircuit bench, and Democrats will\nhave to hustle to find a man capable\nof stepping into his shoes in the Lin-\nneus district.”", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn88068010-1890-04-10-a-i0003-NIL_judge_burgess", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Judge\nB urgess", "Judge Burgess", "Judge\nBurgess", "Judge G. D. Burgess" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88068010-1890-04-10-a-i0003_Q1581", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1581", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Mo", "Missouri" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Judge G. D. Burgess, of Lin‑neus, Mo., candidate for the Democratic nomination… has been in the city for two days past shaking hands with the local politicians.” This indicates that Judge Burgess was physically present in Lincoln, Missouri (the city in Missouri) at some point before the document’s publication date of 1890‑04‑10. The explicit mention of his presence and activity there satisfies the requirement.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage explicitly notes that “Judge G. D. Burgess … has been in the city for two days past shaking hands with the local politicians.” The phrase indicates a physical presence in Linneus, Missouri (a city within Mo) during the period immediately preceding the document’s publication date of 1890‑04‑10. Since “two days past” places his presence on or before 1890‑04‑08, it falls squarely within the 30‑day window (1890‑03‑11 to 1890‑04‑10). Therefore Judge G. D. Burgess was indeed present in Mo during that timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88068010-1890-04-10-a-i0003-NIL_judge_burgess", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Judge\nB urgess", "Judge Burgess", "Judge\nBurgess", "Judge G. D. Burgess" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88068010-1890-04-10-a-i0003_Q577271", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q577271", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Lin-\nneus" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Judge G. D. Burgess, of Lin‑neus, Mo., … has been in the city for two days past shaking hands with the local politicians.” This indicates that as of the document’s publication date (1890‑04‑10), Judge Burgess had already been physically present in Lincoln for a period of two days. Therefore there is explicit evidence that he was at the specified location before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states that “Judge G. D. Burgess … has been in the city for two days past shaking hands with the local politicians.” This indicates that Judge Burgess was physically present in Lincoln (the city) at some point within the 30‑day window preceding the document’s publication date of 1890‑04‑10. The text provides no contradictory evidence, and the mention of “two days past” suggests the presence is recent enough to fall inside that interval. Therefore, Judge Burgess was present in Lincoln during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007", "media": { "publication_title": "The Detroit Tribune", "time_period": "1935-1966", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1950-09-30", "language": "en", "text": "l-HClul) Girl\nat White House\nCharlotte Ingram, outstanding\n4-H club girl of Ellendale, Del.\njoined with 4-H’er Mary Ann\nLong of hSelby. Va., and Mrs,\nFranklin D Roosevelt in present\ning the first homemade United\nNations Flag to President Harry\nS. Truman at the White House\nrecently.\nThis ceremony was first of a\nseries of UN flag presentations\nwhich wil be made to local of\nficials by sewing groups in thous\nands of communities throughout\nthe country for flying on October\n24th, United Nations Day.\nWhite and colored home dem\nonstration agents will take the\nlead in ' developing plans for\nmaking and presenting the flags,\naccording to M. L. Wilson, direc\ntor of Extension Work for the\nU. S. Department of Agriculture.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007-NIL_charlotte_ingram", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Charlotte Ingram" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q35525", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q35525", "loc_mentions_list": [ "White House" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Charlotte Ingram … joined with 4‑H’er Mary Ann Long … and Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt in **presenting the first homemade United Nations Flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House**.” The phrase “at the White House” indicates a physical presence of Charlotte Ingram during that ceremony, which occurred before the document’s publication date (1950‑09‑30). Therefore there is explicit evidence that she was physically present in Washington, D.C., prior to the document’s release.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states: “l-HClul) Girl **at White House** Charlotte Ingram, outstanding 4‑H club girl of Ellendale, Del.” This wording identifies the subject (the girl) as being physically present at the White House. The sentence also notes that she was part of a ceremony with Franklin D. Roosevelt and President Harry S. Truman “recently,” implying the event occurred within a short timeframe. Since the document’s publication date is 1950‑09‑30, the window for presence is from 1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30. The text provides no explicit dates, but “recently” in this context typically refers to an event within a month of publication. Therefore, the passage indicates that Charlotte Ingram was physically present at the White House during that window.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007-NIL_mary_ann_long", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mary Ann\nLong" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q521614", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q521614", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Ellendale, Del." ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage identifies two individuals and their associated places:\n- Charlotte Ingram is described as a “4‑H club girl of Ellendale, Del.”\n- Mary Ann Long is identified as a 4‑H’er from “hSelby. Va.” (likely Harrisburg, Virginia).\n\nThere is no statement indicating that Mary Ann Long was physically present in Ellendale or any other location within Delaware before the document’s publication date (1950‑09‑30). The text only notes her origin as a resident of Harrisburg, VA, and does not mention any travel to Ellendale. Therefore there is no evidence that Mary Ann Long was at Ellendale, Del.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage identifies Mary Ann Long as a 4‑H’er from “hSelby, Va.” It only notes that she joined with Charlotte Ingram, who is described as being from Ellendale, Del. There is no statement indicating that Mary Ann herself was physically present in Ellendale during the relevant time period (the 30‑day window ending on 1950‑09‑30). Consequently, the text does not provide evidence of her presence at that location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q11613", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q11613", "pers_mentions_list": [ "President Harry\nS. Truman" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q35525", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q35525", "loc_mentions_list": [ "White House" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that the group “presented the first homemade United Nations Flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House.” This phrasing implies that the president was physically present in the White House during that ceremony, which occurred before the document’s publication date of 1950‑09‑30. Therefore there is explicit evidence that he was at the specified location prior to the document’s release.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states that President Harry S. Truman was “presenting the first homemade United Nations Flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House recently.” The word “recently” implies the event occurred within a short timeframe, typically understood as within a few days or weeks of the reporting date. Since the document’s publication date is 1950‑09‑30, an event described as “recently” would fall well inside the 30‑day window (from 1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30). No contradictory evidence or dates are provided that place Truman outside this period. Therefore we can conclude that he was physically present at the White House within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007-NIL_mary_ann_long", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mary Ann\nLong" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q7493343", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q7493343", "loc_mentions_list": [ "hSelby. Va." ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage identifies Mary Ann Long as “a 4‑H’er of hSelby, Va.” In the context of 4‑H clubs, being a member of a local club typically implies residence in that town and active participation there. The text does not provide any explicit statement that she was physically present at the White House ceremony; it only notes her affiliation with the club from hSelby, Va. Since the affiliation indicates she lived and participated locally before the document’s publication date (1950‑09‑30), we can infer that she was indeed physically present in hSelby, Va. at some point prior to that date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage identifies Mary Ann Long as a 4‑H club member “of hSelby, Va.” It does not contain any explicit statement that she was physically present at the location during the relevant time window (the 30 days before 1950‑09‑30). The text only notes her affiliation with the community; it lacks a direct claim of presence. Therefore there is no evidence in the document that Mary Ann Long was actually at hSelby, Va. within the required period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q83396", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q83396", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mrs,\nFranklin D Roosevelt" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q7493343", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q7493343", "loc_mentions_list": [ "hSelby. Va." ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article reports that Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt was “presenting” the first homemade United Nations flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House. It does not state or imply that she was physically in hSelby, Va.; only Mary Ann Long is identified as being from that town. Since there is no mention of Mrs. Roosevelt’s presence in hSelby before the document’s publication date (1950‑09‑30), we cannot confirm her physical presence at that location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document notes that “Mrs, Franklin D Roosevelt” participated in a ceremony at the White House, but it does not state or imply any presence at “hSelby. Va.” within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30). No explicit mention of Mrs. Roosevelt being in hSelby, nor a date that places her there during that period, is present in the text. Therefore we cannot confirm her presence at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q83396", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q83396", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mrs,\nFranklin D Roosevelt" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q521614", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q521614", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Ellendale, Del." ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage notes that Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt participated in a ceremony at the White House, but it does not state or imply any visit to Ellendale, Delaware. The only location associated with her is Washington, D.C., and there is no mention of her traveling to or being present in Ellendale before the document’s publication date (1950‑09‑30). Therefore, there is no evidence that she was physically present at Ellendale prior to the document’s release.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document mentions “Mrs, Franklin D Roosevelt” only in the context of being present at the White House during a ceremony. It also notes Charlotte Ingram as a 4‑H club girl from Ellendale, Del., but does not link Mrs. Roosevelt to that location or any event there. There is no sentence indicating she was physically present in Ellendale within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1950‑09‑30). Therefore, the evidence required for a TRUE classification is absent.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007-NIL_charlotte_ingram", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Charlotte Ingram" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q521614", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q521614", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Ellendale, Del." ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Charlotte Ingram, outstanding 4‑H club girl of Ellendale, Del.” This identifies her as a member of a local 4‑H club based in Ellendale, but it does not provide any explicit evidence that she was physically present at the location. The text only records her affiliation; there is no mention of her visiting or being in Ellendale before the document’s publication date (1950‑09‑30). Therefore, we cannot confirm that she was physically present at Ellendale.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage identifies Charlotte Ingram as “an outstanding 4‑H club girl of Ellendale, Del.” This is a statement of affiliation rather than evidence that she was physically present at the location. No specific dates, events, or activities are linked to her presence in Ellendale within the 30‑day window (1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30). The only mention of a ceremony is at the White House and involves other individuals. Therefore there is no explicit textual evidence that Charlotte Ingram was present in Ellendale during the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q83396", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q83396", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mrs,\nFranklin D Roosevelt" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q35525", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q35525", "loc_mentions_list": [ "White House" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Mrs, Franklin D Roosevelt … in present ing the first homemade United Nations Flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House recently.” The phrase “recently” indicates the event occurred within a short timeframe before the document’s publication date of 1950‑09‑30. Therefore the text provides explicit evidence that Mrs. Franklin D Roosevelt was physically present at the White House prior to the publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states that “Mrs, Franklin D Roosevelt in present ing the first homemade United Nations Flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House recently.” It indicates her presence at the White House but does not provide a specific date or time reference tied to that event. The publication date is 1950‑09‑30, so the required window for evidence is from 1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30. Because no explicit temporal marker (e.g., a date or phrase indicating “within the past month”) appears in the text linking her presence to that timeframe, we cannot confirm she was physically present at the White House within the required period. Therefore the claim is not supported by the evidence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007-NIL_charlotte_ingram", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Charlotte Ingram" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q7493343", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q7493343", "loc_mentions_list": [ "hSelby. Va." ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage identifies Charlotte Ingram as a 4‑H club girl from Ellendale, Delaware, and notes that she “joined with” Mary Ann Long of hSelby. Va., along with Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt at the White House. The text does not state that Charlotte herself was physically present in hSelby, Virginia; it only indicates that her companion, Mary Ann Long, is from that location. Therefore there is no evidence that Charlotte Ingram was in hSelby before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states that “Charlotte Ingram … joined with 4‑H’er Mary Ann Long of hSelby. Va.” This indicates that Charlotte was physically present at hSelby, VA when she met the local 4‑H member. The ceremony described as “recently” is tied to this event and falls within the 30‑day window ending on 1950‑09‑30 (i.e., from 1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30). Since the text explicitly names Charlotte Ingram as being in hSelby, VA during that period, the criteria for presence are satisfied.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q11613", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q11613", "pers_mentions_list": [ "President Harry\nS. Truman" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q7493343", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q7493343", "loc_mentions_list": [ "hSelby. Va." ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage notes that Mary Ann Long is from “hSelby, Va.” and that the flag presentation was made to President Harry S. Truman at the White House. It does not state or imply that Truman himself visited hSelby, nor does it provide any evidence of his presence there before the document’s publication date (1950‑09‑30). The only location associated with Truman in the text is the White House, so we cannot infer a visit to hSelby. Therefore there is no supporting evidence that Truman was physically present at hSelby, Va.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that President Harry S. Truman “in presenting” a flag at the White House, but it does not indicate his presence in hSelby, Va. The only mention of hSelby is associated with Mary Ann Long (“of hSelby. Va.”). There is no sentence or clause linking Truman to that location within the 30‑day window (1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30). Therefore, there is no explicit evidence that Truman was physically present at hSelby during the required period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007-NIL_mary_ann_long", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mary Ann\nLong" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q35525", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q35525", "loc_mentions_list": [ "White House" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that Mary Ann Long “joined with … Mrs. Franklin D Roosevelt in presenting the first homemade United Nations Flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House recently.” The phrase “at the White House” indicates she was physically present there during that ceremony, which occurred before the document’s publication date of 1950‑09‑30. Therefore, Mary Ann Long was indeed in the White House prior to the given date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states that Mary Ann Long “joined … and Mrs Franklin D Roosevelt in presenting the first homemade United Nations Flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House recently.” It does not provide a specific date for this ceremony, nor does it indicate that the event occurred within the 30‑day window ending on 1950‑09‑30 (i.e., between 1950‑08‑31 and 1950‑09‑30). The only date mentioned is “October 24th, United Nations Day,” which falls outside that window. Because the text lacks a concrete temporal marker linking Mary Ann Long’s presence at the White House to the required timeframe, we cannot confirm her physical presence within the specified period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q11613", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q11613", "pers_mentions_list": [ "President Harry\nS. Truman" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q521614", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q521614", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Ellendale, Del." ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage reports that Mary Ann Long and Mrs. Franklin D. Roosevelt presented a homemade United Nations flag to President Harry S. Truman “at the White House.” This indicates Truman’s presence in Washington, not in Ellendale, Delaware. The text contains no mention of Truman traveling or being present in Ellendale before the publication date (1950‑09‑30). Therefore there is no evidence that President Harry S. Truman was physically at Ellendale, Del prior to the document’s release.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that President Harry S. Truman was present at the White House during a ceremony, but it does not indicate any visit or activity in Ellendale, Del. The only reference to “Ellendale, Del.” is as the hometown of Charlotte Ingram, a 4‑H club girl, and there is no mention that Truman himself was physically present there within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30). Since the text provides no evidence of Truman’s presence in Ellendale during that period, we cannot confirm his physical presence.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q30088046", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q30088046", "pers_mentions_list": [ "M. L. Wilson, direc\ntor of Extension Work for the\nU. S. Department of Agriculture" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q35525", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q35525", "loc_mentions_list": [ "White House" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage reports a ceremony at the White House in which “Mrs, Franklin D Roosevelt” is listed among those present. M. L. Wilson is identified only as the director of Extension Work for the U.S. Department of Agriculture; there is no mention that he attended or was physically present at the White House during the event. Since the text provides no evidence of Wilson’s presence in Washington, D.C., we cannot conclude that he was there before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage notes that “Mrs, Franklin D Roosevelt … in presenting the first homemade United Nations Flag to President Harry S. Truman at the White House recently.” It also identifies M. L. Wilson as the director of Extension Work for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, but it does not state that Wilson himself was present at the White House or attended the ceremony. The only mention of Wilson is a reference to his role; there is no explicit statement linking him to being in the White House during the timeframe (August 31 – September 30, 1950). Therefore there is no evidence that M. L. Wilson was physically present at the specified location within the required window.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q30088046", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q30088046", "pers_mentions_list": [ "M. L. Wilson, direc\ntor of Extension Work for the\nU. S. Department of Agriculture" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q7493343", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q7493343", "loc_mentions_list": [ "hSelby. Va." ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage identifies M. L. Wilson only as “director of Extension Work for the U.S. Department of Agriculture.” It does not state that he traveled to, attended an event at, or was physically present in hSelby, Va. The only reference to hSelby is a description of Mary Ann Long’s 4‑H club affiliation (“of hSelby. Va.”). No mention of Wilson’s presence there appears in the text. Therefore there is no evidence that M. L. Wilson was at hSelby before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document identifies M. L. Wilson solely as the “director of Extension Work for the U.S. Department of Agriculture.” It does not state that he was physically present at hSelby, Va., nor does it provide any date or event linking him to that location within the 30‑day window (1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30). The only mention of hSelby, Va. is in reference to Mary Ann Long’s affiliation, not Wilson. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that M. L. Wilson was present at the specified location during the required period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q30088046", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q30088046", "pers_mentions_list": [ "M. L. Wilson, direc\ntor of Extension Work for the\nU. S. Department of Agriculture" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-09-30-a-i0007_Q521614", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q521614", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Ellendale, Del." ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage identifies M. L. Wilson only as the director of Extension Work for the U.S. Department of Agriculture and notes his role in a national flag‑presentation program. The only mention of Ellendale, Del is attached to Charlotte Ingram, a 4‑H club girl, with no reference to Wilson’s presence there. There are no dates, travel statements, or other contextual clues linking Wilson to the location before the document’s publication date (1950‑09‑30). Therefore, based on the text alone, we cannot confirm that M. L. Wilson was physically present in Ellendale, Del.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document identifies M. L. Wilson as the director of Extension Work for the U.S. Department of Agriculture and cites his statement about flag presentations. However, it does not state that he was physically present in Ellendale, Del, nor does it provide any date or event linking him to that location within the 30‑day window before the publication (1950‑08‑31 to 1950‑09‑30). The only mention of Ellendale is as the hometown of Charlotte Ingram, unrelated to Wilson. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that M. L. Wilson was present at Ellendale, Del during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003", "media": { "publication_title": "The Elk Mountain Pilot", "time_period": "1880-1924", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1900-01-16", "language": "en", "text": "A DARING OUTLAW.\nLEADER OF BLACK JACK’S\nGANG OF BANDITS.\nUcld-FT p a Train Single-Handed and\nAfterward Fought a Dcspe>rate llattle\nwith Officers — Killed Two Hundred\nMen.\nThe notorious leader of the infamous\n“Black Jack's” gang of train robbeis\nand murderers, Tom Ketchum, now\nlies ia the hospital of the penitentiary\nat Santa Fe, N. M., seriously wounded,\nas the result of an encounter with offi\ncers of the law. Tom held up a train\nsingle-handed and in the sequel to this\nwas wounded and captured. It was\nthe Colorado Southern express that\nTom held up. The place selected was\nnear Fulsom, on the northeast corner\nof New Mexico. One night ns the ex\npress was puffing laboriously up grade\nthe engineer saw a light ahead giving\nthe signal to stop. When the train\nslowed down Tom Ketchum jumped\ninto the cab and, carelessly swinging\na 45 Colt near the engineer's nose,told\nhim to obey all orders given during the\nnext few minutes. This, Tom said,\nwould save heartaches in the engineer's\nhome and the intrusion of an under\ntaker in the family circle. Then he\nJumped off and tried to uncouple the\nengine, which was made impossible by\nthe steep grade. Failing in this, Tom\nwalked back to the Wells-Fargo ex\npress car and, thumping the door with\nthe butt of his Colt, demanded admit\ntance. The messenger opened the door\nand poked the muzzle of a Winchester\nout into the dark and pulled the trig\nger. That put an end to the hold-up\nthat night. Just how badly Tom was\nshot Is not known, but he was wound\ned in a subsequent battle with United\nStates Marshal Foraker’s posse and he\nwill not say how much damage the\nmessenger did. As he declared the\nhold-up off it is probable he was se\nverely injured. The express pulled on\nand Tom Jumped his broncho and\nsought safety in the mountains. The\nattempted robbery was soon known to\nthe officials and three days later Mar\nshal Foraker’s men were hunting for\nTom in the uplands. They finally lilt\nthe trail and followed it hack into the\nvery heart of the mountains. Here\nthey lost it and while discussing the\nbest move a report of a rifle split the\nair and one of the deputies fell out of\nhis saddle. This was sufficient evi\ndence of Tom's presence in the vicin\nity, but not his exact whereabouts, as\nTom used smokeless cartridges. An\nother shot was heart and another depu\nty went to the ground. At this rate\nevery man In the posse would be cut\ndown without a ghost of a chance of\ngetting a shot. The deputies, there\nfore, separated, and began to scout the\nbrush. A glint of sunshine playing on\nthe blue steel barrels of a Winchester\ndiscussed Tom Ketchum’s position be\nhind a big bowlder surrounded by\nbrushwood. Then the day’s proceed\nings began. The deputies shot at that\nglint of sunshine playing along blue\nsteel; Tom shot at the deputies. The\ndeputies dodged behind trees and rocks\nand shot wildly. Tom stayed where\nhe was and made bull-eyes. If Tom\nhadn’t shelved his right arm a little\ntoo high in taking aim he would have\nbrought down a full mess of deputies.\nAs it was a slug of lead as big as your\nfinger tore through Tom’s shooting\nmember, and it took a few minutes\nto change his Winchester over to his\nleft arm. In these short minutes the\ndeputies closed In on Tom and cap\ntured him. He was In a bad shape.\nHis right arm was terribly broken and\ntorn and he was already suffering from\nloss of blood. But he was game. Ho\noffered to take his left arm and begin\nthe performance all over again, which\"\nproposition was respectfully declined.\nThe next day when he was able to be\nmoved Tom was strapped to his bron\ncho and taken to a train, ultimately\nlanding in the penitentiary hospital at\nSanta Fe. Of “Black Jack’s\" gang of\nthieves and cutthroats Tom Ketchum\nwas the leader. He was 35 years old,\nand in Texas, his native state, he is\nknown as the new Jesse James. He\nstands 5 feet 10 inches In his stocking\nfeet and is built on the graceful lines\nof a tiger. He is as void of conscience\nas the Winchester he carried. He\nwould rather shoot a man than eat;\nif the man be an officer of the law it\nwas more fun to kill him than to go\nto a dance. One of his boyhood pas\ntimes was to hire in some convenient\nplace on the ranch in Texas and shoot\nMexican herdsmen. When a lad he\nwas summoned as a witness in a law\nsuit, and not knowing what the sum\nmons meant, and not caring to take\nany chances, shot and killed the officer.\nAfter this he found it convenient to\nchange his residence, so he rode up\ninto New Mexico and Arizona. Here\nhe soon became a terror to everybody\nin general and railroad and express\nsompanies In particular. Ho admits\nin a roundabout way that since 1S88\nhe and his gang have stolen from post-\noffices, trains, stages and wayfarers\n$200,000 and killed 200 men.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1813288", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q1813288", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Tom", "Tom Ketchum" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_fulsom", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Fulsom" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that Tom Ketchum “held up a train … The place selected was near Fulsom, on the northeast corner of New Mexico.” This indicates that during the robbery he was physically present at or very close to Fulsom. Since the incident occurred before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16), Tom Ketchum was indeed in Fulsom prior to that date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The article describes a robbery in which “Tom Ketchum … held up a train” at a place “near Fulsom, on the northeast corner of New Mexico.” This indicates that Tom was physically present at that location during the incident. The text does not provide an explicit date for the event, but it is part of the same narrative that is dated by the publication (1900‑01‑16). Since the hold‑up occurred before the article’s publication and falls within the 30‑day window ending on 1900‑01‑15, Tom Ketchum was indeed present at Fulsom during that period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1813288", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q1813288", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Tom", "Tom Ketchum" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q38555", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q38555", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Santa Fe, N. M" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage reports that “Tom Ketchum now lies in the hospital of the penitentiary at Santa Fe, N. M., seriously wounded…” This indicates that Tom was physically present in Santa Fe before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). The text does not suggest any absence or contradictory claim about his location prior to that date. Therefore there is clear evidence of his presence at the specified location.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage reports that Tom Ketchum “lies in the hospital of the penitentiary at Santa Fe, N.M.” and later that he was taken to a train and “ultimately landing in the penitentiary hospital at Santa Fe.” These statements indicate his physical presence at Santa Fe within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1900‑01‑16). No contradictory dates are given, so the evidence satisfies the requirement.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1813288", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q1813288", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Tom", "Tom Ketchum" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1522", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1522", "loc_mentions_list": [ "New Mexico" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage explicitly states that after the robbery, “Tom Jumped his broncho and sought safety in the mountains.” This indicates Tom’s physical presence in the mountain region of New Mexico at a time prior to the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). Additionally, the text later says he “soon became a terror … Here” referring to that same area, further confirming his presence. Thus there is clear textual evidence that Tom Ketchum was physically in New Mexico before 1900‑01‑16.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The article states that “Tom Ketchum … lies in the hospital of the penitentiary at Santa Fe, N.M.” This indicates Tom’s physical presence in New Mexico at the time the text was written. The document is dated 1900‑01‑16, so the event falls within the 30‑day window preceding that date (from 1900‑01‑01 to 1900‑01‑15). Therefore Tom Ketchum was indeed present in New Mexico during the required period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1813288", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q1813288", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Tom", "Tom Ketchum" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1439", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1439", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Texas" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document explicitly states that Tom Ketchum “is known as the new Jesse James” in Texas and refers to his “native state.” This indicates that he was physically present in Texas prior to the publication date (1900‑01‑16). The narrative also mentions a past incident where he shot an officer while in Texas, further confirming his presence there. Therefore there is clear textual evidence of Tom’s presence in Texas before the document’s date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document identifies Tom Ketchum as “in Texas, his native state,” but it does not provide any explicit date or event that places him physically in Texas within the 30‑day window ending on 1900‑01‑16. The only reference to Texas is a general statement about his origin; there is no mention of a specific visit, meeting, or activity in Texas during that period. Therefore we cannot confirm his presence in Texas within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1813288", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q1813288", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Tom", "Tom Ketchum" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q816", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q816", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Arizona" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article states that after a certain incident, Tom Ketchum “found it convenient to change his residence, so he rode up into New Mexico and Arizona.” This sentence explicitly indicates that he was physically in Arizona at some point before the document’s publication date of 1900‑01‑16. Therefore there is direct evidence of his presence in Arizona prior to the given date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “so he rode up into New Mexico and Arizona,” indicating Tom Ketchum was physically present in Arizona at some point. However, the text provides no explicit date or temporal reference for this movement. The publication date is 1900‑01‑16, so the required window is from 1900‑01‑05 to 1900‑01‑16. Because there is no mention of a specific date within that month linking Tom’s presence in Arizona to an event, we cannot confirm his presence in Arizona during the specified timeframe. Therefore the evidence does not satisfy the criteria for TRUE.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_united_states_marshal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "United\nStates Marshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1522", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1522", "loc_mentions_list": [ "New Mexico" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Mar shall Foraker’s men were hunting for Tom in the uplands.” This indicates that Marshal Foraker was part of a posse operating in New Mexico, which implies his physical presence at the location before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). The text does not provide any contradictory evidence indicating he was elsewhere. Therefore there is direct textual support for his presence in New Mexico prior to 1900‑01‑16.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage mentions “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” and that his men were hunting for Tom, but it does not state that Foraker himself was physically present in New Mexico during the 30‑day window ending on 1900‑01‑16. No date or explicit location linking Foraker to New Mexico is provided within that timeframe. Therefore there is no direct evidence of his presence at the specified location and date.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_united_states_marshal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "United\nStates Marshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_fulsom", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Fulsom" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage describes a train robbery near Fulsom, New Mexico, in which Tom Ketchum was captured and wounded. It notes that “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” later hunted for him in the uplands, but it does not state that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present at Fulsom or that he was part of any activity there before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). The only reference to Foraker is his presence with a posse elsewhere; no explicit mention of him being in Fulsom. Therefore, there is no evidence in the text indicating that Marshal Foraker was at Fulsom prior to 1900‑01‑16.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text describes a train robbery near Fulsom, New Mexico, and mentions that “Tom Ketchum fought a decisive battle with Officers — Killed Two Hundred Men.” It also notes that “Mar shall Foraker’s men were hunting for Tom in the uplands,” indicating Marshal Foraker’s posse was active but not stating that he himself was at Fulsom. No sentence explicitly places United States Marshal Foraker at the location of Fulsom within a timeframe close to the publication date (1900‑01‑16). Therefore there is no direct evidence that he was physically present at Fulsom during the 30‑day window preceding the document’s publication.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_united_states_marshal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "United\nStates Marshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q38555", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q38555", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Santa Fe, N. M" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage refers to “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” and notes that the posse was hunting for Tom in the uplands, but it never states that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present at Santa Fe. The only mention of Santa Fe is that Tom was taken there after his capture; no sentence links Foraker to that location. Therefore there is no explicit evidence in the text that Marshal Foraker was in Santa Fe before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document refers to “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” and later describes Tom Ketchum being taken to a train that lands at the penitentiary hospital in Santa Fe, NM. However, there is no explicit statement indicating that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present in Santa Fe during the 30‑day window ending on 1900‑01‑16 (i.e., from 1900‑01‑01 to 1900‑01‑15). The text only mentions his posse, not Foraker’s presence at that location or any date linking him there. Consequently, the required evidence is absent.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_mar_shal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mar\nshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_fulsom", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Fulsom" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage describes a train robbery in which Tom Ketchum held up the Colorado Southern express near Fulsom, New Mexico. It then reports that Marshal Foraker’s posse hunted for Tom in the uplands and eventually lost the trail. The text contains no mention of Marshal Foraker being physically present at Fulsom or any activity there before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). Therefore, there is no evidence supporting his presence at that location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that “Marshal Foraker’s men were hunting for Tom in the uplands,” but it does not state that Foraker himself was present at Fulsom, nor does it provide any date or time linking his presence to the location. The only mention of Fulsom is as the site of a train robbery (“The place selected was near Fulsom…”) and there is no indication that Foraker was there during the relevant 30‑day window (Dec 17, 1899 – Jan 16, 1900). Therefore there is no explicit evidence in the text confirming Foraker’s presence at Fulsom within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_mar_shal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mar\nshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1522", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1522", "loc_mentions_list": [ "New Mexico" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Mar shall Foraker’s men were hunting for Tom in the uplands.” The phrase “in the uplands” refers to a region within New Mexico, indicating that Marshal Foraker was physically present there at some point before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). This explicit mention of his presence satisfies the requirement.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document describes a train robbery and subsequent actions by the posse of United States Marshal Foraker, but it does not contain any explicit statement that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present in New Mexico during the 30‑day period ending on 1900‑01‑16. The only references to him are “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” and later “Mar shall Foraker’s men were hunting for Tom,” which indicate that his men were in the area, but they do not name a specific location or confirm Foraker’s presence at that site within the required time window. Moreover, the narrative appears to concern events from earlier decades (e.g., “he was 35 years old” and references to 1888), well outside the 30‑day window before the publication date. Therefore there is no direct evidence of Marshal Foraker’s presence in New Mexico within the specified timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_mar_shal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mar\nshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q38555", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q38555", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Santa Fe, N. M" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage refers to “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” and notes that the posse was hunting for Tom in the uplands near Santa Fe. However, it does not state that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present at Santa Fe or provide any direct evidence of his presence there before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). The text only indicates the posse’s activity; it does not confirm that the marshal was in Santa Fe. Therefore, based on the available information, we cannot establish that Marshal Foraker was at Santa Fe, NM prior to 1900‑01‑16.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that Tom Ketchum was taken to the hospital in Santa Fe, NM, but it only mentions “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” as a group of officers pursuing him. It does not state that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present at Santa Fe during the relevant time window (1900‑01‑01 to 1900‑01‑15). The only reference to Foraker is in the context of his posse hunting Tom, which could have taken place elsewhere. Since there is no explicit mention that Marshal Foraker was at Santa Fe within the required 30‑day period before the publication date, we cannot confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_mar_shal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mar\nshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1439", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1439", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Texas" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage describes a confrontation between Tom Ketchum and the United States Marshal Foraker’s posse, noting that “Mar shall Foraker’s men were hunting for Tom” and that they followed him into the mountains. However, it does not state that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present in Texas at any time before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). The text only references his posse’s activities; there is no mention of Foraker traveling to or being located in Texas. Consequently, there is no evidence in the document indicating that Marshal Foraker was in Texas prior to 1900‑01‑16.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document discusses a train robbery and the actions of Tom Ketchum, as well as the pursuit by United States Marshal Foraker’s posse. It notes that “Mar shall Foraker's men were hunting for Tom in the uplands,” but it does not specify that this occurred in Texas or provide any date within the 30‑day window (1900‑01‑01 to 1900‑01‑15). The only mention of Texas is about Ketchum’s native state, not Foraker. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that Marshal Foraker was physically present in Texas during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_united_states_marshal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "United\nStates Marshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q1439", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1439", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Texas" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage describes Tom Ketchum’s activities and the actions of his gang, including a reference to “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” that hunted for Tom in the uplands near Santa Fe. The text does not state that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present in Texas; it only mentions him as part of a posse operating elsewhere. No other mention of Foraker being in Texas appears before the publication date (1900‑01‑16). Therefore there is no evidence that he was in Texas prior to that date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document describes a robbery near Santa Fe, NM, and mentions “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse” hunting for the outlaw in the uplands. It does not state that Foraker was physically present in Texas, nor does it provide any date or location linking him to Texas within the 30‑day window ending on 1900‑01‑16. Therefore there is no explicit evidence of his presence in Texas during that period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_mar_shal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mar\nshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q816", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q816", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Arizona" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage describes Tom Ketchum’s activities and the actions of “United States Marshal Foraker’s posse.” It notes that the posse followed Tom into the mountains, but it does not specify a location such as Arizona for either the posse or Foraker himself. The only reference to Arizona in the text is the mention that Ketchum had moved from Texas to New Mexico and Arizona, but this refers to Ketchum’s movement, not Foraker’s presence there. There is no statement indicating that Marshal Foraker was physically present in Arizona before the document’s publication date (1900‑01‑16). Therefore, based on the evidence provided, we cannot confirm his presence at that location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports on Tom Ketchum’s activities, including a reference to “Mar shall Foraker’s men were hunting for Tom in the uplands.” This sentence indicates that Marshal Foraker’s posse was conducting a search, but it does not state that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present in Arizona. No other part of the text provides a date or location linking Marshal Foraker to Arizona within the 30‑day window preceding the publication (1900‑01‑16). Therefore there is no explicit evidence that Marshal Foraker was in Arizona during that period, and the classification must be FALSE.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003-NIL_united_states_marshal_foraker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "United\nStates Marshal Foraker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn86063397-1900-01-16-a-i0003_Q816", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q816", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Arizona" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage describes a chase by “Mar shall Foraker’s men” and notes that they followed Tom into the mountains, but it does not specify that this occurred in Arizona or that Marshal Foraker himself was physically present there before 1900‑01‑16. The only location associated with Foraker is Santa Fe, New Mexico (the penitentiary hospital), and the text contains no mention of him traveling to or being in Arizona prior to the publication date. Therefore there is no evidence that Marshal Foraker was physically present in Arizona before 1900‑01‑16.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that United States Marshal Foraker was involved in a pursuit that ended with him being taken to a hospital in Santa Fe, New Mexico. It also notes that Tom Ketchum “rode up into New Mexico and Arizona,” but it provides no date or explicit statement that the marshal himself entered Arizona during the 30‑day window ending on 1900‑01‑16 (i.e., between 1900‑01‑05 and 1900‑01‑16). The text merely indicates a movement into Arizona without confirming that Foraker was physically present there within the required timeframe. Therefore, there is no evidence in the document that meets the criteria for presence at the specified location during the relevant period.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007", "media": { "publication_title": "Putnam County Herald", "time_period": "1903-1922", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-test-en.tsv", "date": "1920-01-29", "language": "en", "text": "NOTICE.\nBy virtue of a bil of sale issued\nby Tom Scarlett, Circuit Court Clerk\nfor Putnam County, .ennessee, dated\non the 6tU. day of January, 1920, I\nwill expore to sale to tne highest\nbidder for cash on the 31st day of\nJanuary, 1920, at 1:0; o’clock, P. M.\nat the Courthouse door in the Town\nof Cookeville, the following property,\nto-wit:\nA house and lot located in the 19th\nCivil District of Putnam County,\nTennessee, containing one acre,\nmore or less, bounded on the east\nby the lands of J. R. Watson; on the\nnorth by the T. C. R. K. Co.; on the\nwest by the lands of Phy; on the\nsouth by the lands of J. R. Watson;\nlevied on as the lands of D. Ritten\nberry, to satisfy a Judgment in favor\nof P. L. Ramsey ag-ih st him, with\ninterest and all the cost.i of the case.\nThis Jan. 6th, 1920.\nL. F. MILLER, Sheriff.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_phy", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Phy" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q1509", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1509", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tennessee", ".ennessee" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document lists “Phy” as the owner of land that borders the described property, but it provides no indication that Phy himself visited or was physically present in Tennessee at any point prior to the publication date (1920‑01‑29). The reference merely identifies a parcel of land belonging to him; it does not contain any statement about his presence, travel, or activity in the state. Therefore there is no textual evidence that Phy was physically present in Tennessee before the document’s publication.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document lists “Phy” as the owner of adjacent lands (“on the west by the lands of Phy;”), but it does not state that Phy was physically present in Tennessee or at any specific location within the 30‑day window ending on 1920‑01‑29. There is no mention of a date, event, or presence tied to Phy’s physical presence. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that Phy was present at “Tennessee, .ennessee” during the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_j_r_watson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "J. R. Watson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q495045", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q495045", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Putnam County" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document describes a parcel of land within Putnam County, Tennessee, noting that it is bounded on the east and south by “the lands of J. R. Watson.” This indicates ownership or legal title to land adjacent to the property, but it does not state that J. R. Watson was physically present in Putnam County at any time before the publication date (1920‑01‑29). The text contains no mention of him traveling there, residing there, or being in the area; it merely references his land as a boundary. Therefore there is no evidence that he was physically present in Putnam County prior to 1920‑01‑29.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document is a legal notice describing the boundaries of property in Putnam County and mentions “J. R. Watson” only as part of the land description (“on the east by the lands of J. R. Watson”). It does not state that Watson was physically present at any location or provide a date for his presence. Since there is no explicit evidence that he was in Putnam County within the 30‑day window ending on 1920‑01‑29, we cannot confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_d_ritten_berry", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "D. Ritten\nberry" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q1509", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1509", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tennessee", ".ennessee" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice is a legal document from the Circuit Court Clerk concerning a sale of property located in Putnam County, Tennessee. It identifies “the lands of D. Ritten berry” as part of the parcel being sold to satisfy a judgment against P. L. Ramsey. The text contains no statement that D. Ritten berry himself was physically present at any location in Tennessee or elsewhere; it merely references his ownership interest in the land. Because there is no explicit mention of his presence, we cannot confirm that he was in Tennessee before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document is a bill of sale dated January 6, 1920, describing the sale of land in Putnam County, Tennessee. It references “the lands of D. Ritten berry” as part of the property description and mentions a judgment against him, but it does not state that D. Ritten berry himself was physically present at any location or provide a date for such presence. The only dates mentioned are the sale date (January 6) and the publication date (1920‑01‑29). Since there is no explicit statement that D. Ritten berry was in Tennessee within the 30‑day window preceding the document’s publication, we cannot confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_tom_scarlett_circuit_court_clerk_for_putnam_county", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Tom Scarlett, Circuit Court Clerk\nfor Putnam County" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q1509", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1509", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tennessee", ".ennessee" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice is dated “Jan 6, 1920” and is issued by “Tom Scarlett, Circuit Court Clerk for Putnam County, .ennessee.” The clerk’s office would be located in Putnam County, Tennessee (the courthouse in Cookeville). By virtue of the bill of sale being issued from that office, Tom Scarlett must have been physically present at the courthouse and thus within Tennessee before the document’s publication date of 1920‑01‑29. The text provides no indication that he was elsewhere or absent; it simply records his role in a local transaction. Therefore there is clear evidence that he was present in Tennessee prior to the publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document notes that Tom Scarlett is “Circuit Court Clerk for Putnam County” and that a bill of sale issued by him was dated January 6, 1920. However, it does not contain any explicit statement indicating that he himself was physically present in Tennessee (or Putnam County) during the 30‑day window ending on January 29, 1920. The text only references his role and the issuance of a document; it lacks any mention of him being at a location or attending an event there within that timeframe. Because the task requires direct evidence of presence, we must conclude that the criteria are not met.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_j_r_watson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "J. R. Watson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q1509", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1509", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tennessee", ".ennessee" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice describes a parcel of land in Putnam County, Tennessee and notes that the parcel’s boundaries are defined by “the lands of J. R. Watson.” This indicates ownership or control of the land, not physical presence. The text contains no statement that J. R. Watson was physically present in Tennessee at any time before 1920‑01‑29 (e.g., no mention of him traveling there, attending a meeting, or being in the area). Therefore there is no evidence supporting his physical presence in the specified location prior to the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The notice describes a property sale and lists the owners of surrounding lands, including “J. R. Watson.” However, it does not contain any statement indicating that Watson himself was physically present at the location (or even in Tennessee) during the relevant time window. The only temporal reference is the date of the bill of sale (January 6, 1920), which is outside the 30‑day window ending on January 29, 1920. Since there is no explicit evidence that Watson was present in Tennessee within that period, we must conclude that his presence cannot be verified.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_d_ritten_berry", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "D. Ritten\nberry" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q2456192", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q2456192", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Cookeville" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice is a legal document describing the sale of property and lists “levied on as the lands of D. Ritten berry” among other parties. It does not contain any statement that D. Ritten berry was physically present in Cookeville, nor does it mention him traveling or being at the courthouse. The only location referenced is Cookeville (the town where the sale would occur), but there is no indication that the person himself was there before the document’s publication date of 1920‑01‑29. Therefore there is no evidence in the text supporting his presence.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document is a notice about the sale of property and lists “levied on as the lands of D. Ritten berry” in connection with a judgment, but it does not state that D. Rittenberry was physically present at Cookeville or provide any date linking his presence to Cookeville within the 30‑day window (1920‑01‑01 to 1920‑01‑29). The only dated reference in the text is “This Jan. 6th, 1920” referring to Sheriff L. F. Miller, not D. Rittenberry. Since there is no explicit evidence of his presence at Cookeville during that period, we cannot confirm it.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_tom_scarlett_circuit_court_clerk_for_putnam_county", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Tom Scarlett, Circuit Court Clerk\nfor Putnam County" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q2456192", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q2456192", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Cookeville" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice states that a bill of sale was issued by “Tom Scarlett, Circuit Court Clerk for Putnam County” and that it would be sold at the courthouse door in Cookeville. This implies that Tom Scarlett himself was present at the courthouse to sign or deliver the document on January 6, 1920—well before the publication date of 1920‑01‑29. The text does not merely mention his office location; it explicitly references a physical presence in Cookeville. Therefore there is direct evidence that Tom Scarlett was physically present at Cookeville prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that a bill of sale was issued by “Tom Scarlett, Circuit Court Clerk for Putnam County” on the 6th day of January 1920. The event described as taking place at the Courthouse door in Cookeville is dated only with the location and time (“at 1:0; o’clock”), but it does not indicate that Tom Scarlett himself was present there. Moreover, the date (January 6, 1920) falls outside the 30‑day window preceding the publication date of January 29, 1920 (which would be from January 28 to January 29). Since there is no explicit statement that Tom Scarlett was physically present in Cookeville within that timeframe, we cannot confirm his presence. Therefore the correct classification is FALSE.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_phy", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Phy" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q495045", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q495045", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Putnam County" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document lists “Phy” as the owner of adjacent land (“on the west by the lands of Phy”), which indicates a property interest but provides no indication that the person himself was physically present in Putnam County at any time before 1920‑01‑29. No narrative, witness statement, or activity involving “Phy” is described; only his land ownership is mentioned. Therefore there is no evidence of physical presence.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document is a notice about a property sale in Putnam County, Tennessee. It lists the property’s boundaries, noting “west by the lands of Phy;” This phrase merely identifies a neighboring landowner; it does not state that Phy was physically present at Putnam County or that any event involving him occurred there within the 30‑day window ending on January 29, 1920. No other part of the text mentions Phy’s presence, attendance, or activity in the area during that period. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that Phy was present at Putnam County within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_phy", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Phy" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q2456192", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q2456192", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Cookeville" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is a notice about a property sale and lists “Phy” as the owner of adjacent land (“on the west by the lands of Phy”). It does not contain any statement that Phy was physically present in Cookeville, nor does it mention any visit or activity there. The only reference to Cookeville is the location of the courthouse door where the sale would occur; this pertains to the property itself, not to Phy’s presence. Therefore there is no evidence in the text that Phy was at Cookeville before the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains the name “Phy” only as part of a description of land boundaries (“on the west by the lands of Phy”). There is no sentence indicating that Phy himself was present at Cookeville, nor any date or event linking his presence to that location. The text merely lists property details and does not provide evidence of the person’s physical presence in Cookeville within the 30‑day window ending on 1920‑01‑29. Therefore we cannot confirm his presence at the specified location during that period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_j_r_watson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "J. R. Watson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q2456192", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q2456192", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Cookeville" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice describes the sale of property located in Putnam County, Tennessee, and notes that it is bounded on the east by the lands of J. R. Watson. The text only identifies Watson as a landowner; there is no mention of him being present at Cookeville or any other location within the document. Since the absence of any reference to his physical presence in Cookeville before the publication date (1920‑01‑29) means we cannot confirm that he was there, the correct classification is FALSE.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document describes a property that is bounded by the lands of J. R. Watson and provides details about its location in Cookeville, Tennessee. However, it contains no explicit statement indicating that J. R. Watson himself was physically present at the courthouse or town during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (January 29, 1920). The only reference to him is a land boundary description, which does not imply personal presence. Therefore there is no evidence in the text that J. R. Watson was present at Cookeville within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_p_l_ramsey", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "P. L. Ramsey" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q1509", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1509", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tennessee", ".ennessee" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice describes a property sale and references “P. L. Ramsey” as the party for whom a judgment was levied, but it contains no indication that he himself was physically present at any location in Tennessee (or specifically Cookeville) before the publication date of 1920‑01‑29. The only mention of him is his name appearing in a legal context (“judgment in favor of P. L. Ramsey”), which does not imply personal presence. Therefore there is no textual evidence that he was at the specified location prior to the document’s date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document references a judgment in favor of “P. L. Ramsey” and notes the property’s location in Tennessee, but it contains no explicit statement indicating that Ramsey himself was physically present at any site in Tennessee during the 30‑day window ending on 1920‑01‑29 (i.e., between 1920‑01‑30 and 1920‑01‑29). The text only mentions his legal status, not a presence event. Therefore there is no direct evidence that he was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_d_ritten_berry", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "D. Ritten\nberry" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q495045", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q495045", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Putnam County" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice describes a bill of sale for property located in Putnam County and notes that the land is “levied on as the lands of D. Ritten berry.” This indicates that D. Rittenberry owned land in the county, but it does not state that he was physically present at the courthouse or any other location within Putnam County. The text only references his property; there is no mention of him attending a meeting, signing documents, or being in the area before the publication date (1920‑01‑29). Therefore, there is no evidence that he was physically present at the specified location prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The notice refers to “levied on as the lands of D. Ritten berry,” indicating that the land was subject to levy, but it does not state that D. Ritten berry himself was physically present at Putnam County or provide any date for his presence. No explicit mention of a visit, meeting, or event involving him within the 30‑day window (Dec 30 – Jan 29, 1920) appears in the text. Therefore there is no direct evidence that he was present at Putnam County during that period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_tom_scarlett_circuit_court_clerk_for_putnam_county", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Tom Scarlett, Circuit Court Clerk\nfor Putnam County" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q495045", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q495045", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Putnam County" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that Tom Scarlett is “Circuit Court Clerk for Putnam County” and that a bill of sale was issued by him dated January 6, 1920. Issuing a bill of sale requires the clerk to be physically present at the courthouse in Putnam County on that date. Since the publication date is January 29, 1920, this presence occurred before the document’s publication. Therefore there is explicit evidence that Tom Scarlett was in Putnam County prior to 1920‑01‑29.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that the bill of sale was “issued by Tom Scarlett, Circuit Court Clerk for Putnam County, Tennessee, dated on the 6th day of January, 1920.” Issuing a bill of sale requires the clerk to be physically present at the courthouse in Putnam County. The date (January 6, 1920) falls within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date of January 29, 1920 (i.e., from Jan 1 to Jan 29). Therefore Tom Scarlett was present at Putnam County during that period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_l_f_miller_sheriff", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "L. F. MILLER, Sheriff" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q495045", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q495045", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Putnam County" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice identifies “L. F. MILLER, Sheriff” and references a property sale at the Courthouse door in Cookeville, which lies within Putnam County. The title of sheriff indicates that Miller was the official law‑enforcement officer for that county, implying his physical presence there before the document’s publication date (1920‑01‑29). No contradictory evidence is present; thus we have textual support that he was physically in Putnam County.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains the name “L. F. MILLER, Sheriff” but does not explicitly state that he was physically present in Putnam County within 30 days before the publication date (1920‑01‑29). The only reference to him is a simple identification as sheriff; there is no accompanying location or event indicating his presence at the courthouse, town of Cookeville, or any other site in Putnam County during that window. Because the text lacks explicit evidence of his physical presence at the specified location within the required timeframe, we cannot confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_l_f_miller_sheriff", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "L. F. MILLER, Sheriff" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q1509", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1509", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tennessee", ".ennessee" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The notice is issued by Tom Scarlett for Putnam County, Tennessee, and it lists “L. F. MILLER, Sheriff” among the officials involved. As a sheriff of that county, Miller would have been physically present in Putnam County (and thus in Tennessee) to perform his duties before the document’s publication date of 1920‑01‑29. The text provides no indication that he was elsewhere or absent; rather it places him as part of the local authority. Therefore there is evidence that Miller was physically present at the specified location (Tennessee, Putnam County) prior to the publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states: “This Jan. 6th, 1920. L. F. MILLER, Sheriff.” This indicates that L. F. MILLER was serving as sheriff on 6 January 1920, which falls within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date of 29 January 1920 (Jan 6 is 23 days earlier). The sheriff’s office in Putnam County, Tennessee, places him physically present in Tennessee on that date. Therefore the text provides explicit evidence that L. F. MILLER was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007-NIL_p_l_ramsey", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "P. L. Ramsey" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-29-a-i0007_Q495045", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q495045", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Putnam County" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is a notice of a property sale and references a judgment “in favor of P. L. Ramsey.” This indicates that Ramsey was the plaintiff or beneficiary of the judgment, but it does not state that he was physically present in Putnam County at any time before the publication date. The text only mentions the location of the property and the court clerk’s actions; there is no mention of Ramsey being at the courthouse, traveling to Putnam County, or otherwise being present there. Therefore there is no evidence in the document that confirms his physical presence in Putnam County prior to 1920‑01‑29.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document is a notice of sale dated January 6, 1920, and it references “a Judgment in favor of P. L. Ramsey” but does not state that he was physically present in Putnam County at any time. There are no dates or location‑specific statements linking his presence to the 30‑day window ending on January 29, 1920 (i.e., from roughly January 30 to January 29). Consequently, there is no explicit evidence that P. L. Ramsey was present in Putnam County within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false } ] }, { "document_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001", "media": { "publication_title": "Pullman Herald", "time_period": "1888-1989", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1910-12-16", "language": "en", "text": "MAY BUILD CLUB BOUSE\nCHAMBER OF COMMERCE CON\nSIDERS ADVISABILITY OF\nERECTING BUILDING FOR\nMEETINGS AND PERMANENT\nEXHIBIT.\nAnother large and enthusiastic\nmeeting of the Pullman Chamber of\nCommerce was held in the I. O. O. F.\nhall Tuesday evening. The board of\ntrustees announced that C. H. Har\nrison had been made secretary and\ntreasurer. The several committees\nreported and then a general discus\nsion ensued regarding the adoption\nof an emblem and the securing of a\npermanent home. Several artistic\ndesigns for the emblem were sub\nmitted but it was decided to post\npone action for another week.\nA number of enthusiastic speech\nes were made advocating the raising\nof a sufficient fund to build a home\nfor the club and before adjournment\nit was decided to appoint a commit\ntee to look into the possibility of\nraising the necessary funds. ,\nS. B. Nelson of Spokane made a\nstirring address in which he insisted\nthat the all important factor in ac\ncomplishing results was to make a\nstart and dwelt upon the indirect\nbenefits resulting from every effort\nto improve a city.\nHe was follewed by F. P. Greene,\nof Spokane, who explained the work\nof the Chamber of Commerce of that\ncity and expressed the earnest desire\nof the Spokane business men to co\noperate with all tho other cities and\ntowns of the Inland Empire in up\nbuilding and developing Eastern\nWashington. Ho said that the pros\nperity of Spokane depended not so\nmuch upon the mines as upon the\nwheat fields and orchards of the Pa-\nlouse country.\nThe club adjourned to meet next\nTuesday evening by which time it is\nhoped the membership will have\npassed the 125 mark.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_f_p_greene", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "F. P. Greene" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q187805", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q187805", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Spokane" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “F. P. Greene, of Spokane, who explained the work …” This indicates that Greene is a resident/affiliated with Spokane and that he participated in an event (the meeting) held there. The phrase “explained the work” implies his physical presence at the location to give testimony or speak. Therefore there is explicit evidence that F. P. Greene was physically present in Spokane before the document’s publication date of 1910‑12‑16.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document notes that “F. P. Greene, of Spokane, who explained the work…” This sentence identifies Greene’s affiliation with Spokane but does not provide any explicit statement that he was physically present in Spokane during the 30‑day window ending on 1910‑12‑16 (i.e., between 1910‑11‑17 and 1910‑12‑16). The text merely records his role as a speaker; it does not mention an event, meeting, or visit that would confirm his presence at the location within that timeframe. Consequently, there is no direct evidence in the document to satisfy the requirement of physical presence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_c_h_har_rison", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "C. H. Har\nrison" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_i_o_o_f_hall", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "I. O. O. F.\nhall" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article reports that a Pullman Chamber of Commerce meeting was held “in the I. O. O. F. hall Tuesday evening.” It also states that “the board of trustees announced that C. H. Harison had been made secretary and treasurer,” implying he attended the meeting as part of the board. Since the meeting took place in the specified location before the document’s publication date (1910‑12‑16), there is direct evidence that C. H. Harison was physically present at the I. O. O. F. hall.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that the Pullman Chamber of Commerce held a meeting in the I. O. O. F. hall on Tuesday evening, and it notes that “C. H. Harison had been made secretary and treasurer.” However, there is no explicit statement indicating that C. H. Harison himself was present at that location during the meeting or within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1910‑12‑16 to 1910‑11‑16). The text only confirms his appointment, not his physical presence in the hall. Therefore, there is no direct evidence of his presence at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_s_b_nelson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "S. B. Nelson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q187805", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q187805", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Spokane" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “S. B. Nelson of Spokane made a stirring address…”. The act of delivering an address requires physical presence at the venue, which is implied to be in Spokane (the meeting was held there). Therefore S. B. Nelson was present in Spokane before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states “S. B. Nelson of Spokane made a stirring address…” This indicates that S. B. Nelson was physically present in Spokane to deliver the speech, which occurred on Tuesday evening (the meeting date). The publication date is 1910‑12‑16; the preceding 30 days span from 1910‑11‑16 to 1910‑12‑16. Since the address was delivered within that window, S. B. Nelson’s presence in Spokane satisfies the criteria.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_f_p_greene", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "F. P. Greene" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q1223", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1223", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Washington" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document notes that “F. P. Greene, of Spokane” gave a speech during a meeting held in the I.O.O.F. hall. Being described as “of Spokane” indicates he is affiliated with and physically present at Spokane (a city within Washington state) when he spoke. Since the meeting occurred before the document’s publication date of 1910‑12‑16, Greene was indeed in Washington at that time.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “S. B. Nelson … He was followed by F. P. Greene, of Spokane…” indicating Greene’s affiliation with the Spokane Chamber of Commerce. It does not provide any explicit statement that Greene himself was physically present in Washington (or even at the meeting) within the 30‑day window ending on 1910‑12‑16. The only location mentioned is “Spokane,” which is a city in Washington, but the text merely identifies his origin or affiliation, not an actual presence there during the relevant period. Therefore there is no direct evidence that F. P. Greene was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_f_p_greene", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "F. P. Greene" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q128038", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q128038", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Pa-\nlouse country" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage notes that F. P. Greene is “of Spokane” and makes a comment about the prosperity of Spokane depending on wheat fields in Pa‑louse country. It does not state or imply that Greene himself was physically present in Pa‑louse country; it merely references the region’s agricultural importance from his perspective as a speaker. No other part of the text indicates any visit, travel, or presence by Greene to Pa‑louse country before the document’s publication date (1910‑12‑16). Therefore there is no evidence supporting that he was physically present at that location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document mentions “F. P. Greene, of Spokane,” who gave a speech about the Chamber of Commerce and referenced the prosperity of Spokane, noting that it depended on wheat fields and orchards in Pa‑louse country. However, there is no explicit statement indicating that Greene himself was physically present at Pa‑louse country during the 30‑day window (1910‑11‑16 to 1910‑12‑16). The text only records his remarks from Spokane; it does not provide evidence of his presence in Pa‑louse country. Therefore, we cannot confirm that he was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_s_b_nelson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "S. B. Nelson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q1223", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1223", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Washington" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article notes that “S. B. Nelson of Spokane made a stirring address…”. The phrase “of Spokane” indicates his affiliation and residence in Spokane, Washington. Since he is identified as being from Spokane, it implies he was physically present there before the document’s publication date (1910‑12‑16). Therefore we can conclude that S. B. Nelson was indeed at the specified location.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document notes that “S. B. Nelson of Spokane made a stirring address,” indicating his affiliation with Spokane, but it does not state that he was physically present in Washington during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1910‑12‑16). No explicit mention of his presence at “Washington” or any date tied to such an event is found. Therefore there is no evidence that S. B. Nelson was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_c_h_har_rison", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "C. H. Har\nrison" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q187805", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q187805", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Spokane" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document reports a meeting of the Pullman Chamber of Commerce and notes that “C. H. Harison had been made secretary and treasurer.” It does not mention any location associated with Harison, nor does it state that he was in Spokane. The only reference to Spokane is to S. B. Nelson, who is identified as being from Spokane. Therefore there is no textual evidence indicating that C. H. Harison was physically present in Spokane before the publication date of 1910‑12‑16.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that C. H. Harison had been appointed secretary and treasurer of the Pullman Chamber of Commerce, but it does not state that he was physically present in Spokane or provide any date for such a presence. The only individuals explicitly linked to Spokane are S. B. Nelson and F. P. Greene, both noted as being from Spokane. Since there is no explicit evidence that C. H. Harison was in Spokane within the 30‑day window ending on 1910‑12‑16, we cannot confirm his presence at that location during that period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_s_b_nelson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "S. B. Nelson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_i_o_o_f_hall", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "I. O. O. F.\nhall" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “S. B. Nelson of Spokane made a stirring address” during a meeting held in the I. O. O. F. hall on Tuesday evening. This indicates that he was physically present at the hall when the meeting took place, which is before the publication date (1910‑12‑16). Therefore there is direct evidence of his presence.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states that “S. B. Nelson of Spokane made a stirring address in which he insisted…” and that this occurred at the meeting held “in the I. O. O. F. hall Tuesday evening.” The document’s publication date is 1910‑12‑16, so the relevant window for presence is from 1910‑11‑16 to 1910‑12‑16. A “Tuesday” in that period would be 1910‑12‑14 (or 1910‑12‑14), which falls within the 30‑day window. Therefore, the text provides explicit evidence that S. B. Nelson was physically present at the I. O. O. F. hall during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_s_b_nelson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "S. B. Nelson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q128038", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q128038", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Pa-\nlouse country" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document notes that S. B. Nelson made an address and mentioned the wheat fields and orchards of “Pa‑louse country” as part of his remarks on Spokane’s prosperity. However, it does not state that he himself was physically present in Pa‑louse country; it merely references the region from a speaker’s perspective. Without explicit evidence of his presence—such as a statement that he visited or was there—the text provides no proof that S. B. Nelson was at that location before the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage notes that S. B. Nelson, who was “of Spokane,” delivered an address about the prosperity of Spokane and referenced the wheat fields and orchards of the Palouse country. However, it does not state that he himself was physically present in or at the Palouse country; only that he spoke about its agricultural importance. Since there is no explicit mention of his presence in the location within the 30‑day window before the publication date (1910‑12‑16), we cannot confirm his physical presence there.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_f_p_greene", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "F. P. Greene" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_i_o_o_f_hall", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "I. O. O. F.\nhall" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document reports a meeting held in the I. O. O. F. hall on Tuesday evening. Within that description it states that “He was followed by F. P. Greene, of Spokane, who explained the work…” This indicates that Greene delivered an address at the meeting, which would require his physical presence in the hall before the document’s publication date (1910‑12‑16). Therefore there is explicit evidence that F. P. Greene was present at the I. O. O. F. hall prior to the publication.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage reports a meeting held in the I. O. O. F. hall and notes that “He was followed by F. P. Greene, of Spokane…” This indicates Greene spoke after Nelson during the same event, but it does not explicitly state that Greene himself was physically present at the hall. The text only identifies his affiliation (Spokane) and his role in the meeting; there is no mention of him being inside or attending the I. O. O. F. hall itself. Because the required evidence of presence within the 30‑day window before the publication date (1910‑12‑16) is absent, we cannot confirm his physical presence at that location.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_c_h_har_rison", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "C. H. Har\nrison" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q1223", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1223", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Washington" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document reports that C. H. Harison was appointed secretary and treasurer of the Pullman Chamber of Commerce, indicating his role within the organization. It also notes that a meeting of the chamber was held in the I.O.O.F. hall (presumably in Washington). However, there is no explicit statement that Harison himself attended or was physically present at that location; it only describes his appointment and the meeting’s occurrence. Since the text does not provide evidence of Harison’s presence in Washington before the publication date, we cannot confirm his physical presence.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that C. H. Harison had been appointed secretary and treasurer of the Pullman Chamber of Commerce, but it does not state that he attended or was physically present at any meeting in Washington during the 30‑day window ending on 1910‑12‑16. The only mention of a location is “Spokane,” which is within Washington, but this refers to S. B. Nelson and F. P. Greene, not Harison. No explicit date or event linking Harison’s presence in Washington appears in the text. Therefore there is no evidence that he was physically present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001-NIL_c_h_har_rison", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "C. H. Har\nrison" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-12-16-a-i0001_Q128038", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q128038", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Pa-\nlouse country" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document discusses a meeting of the Pullman Chamber of Commerce in Spokane and includes statements about the prosperity of “Pa‑louse country.” However, it does not mention C. H. Harison being physically present there or any activity that would place him at that location. The only reference to Harison is his appointment as secretary and treasurer within the club’s board. Since no evidence in the text indicates he was in Pa‑louse country before the publication date, we conclude that the claim lacks support.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that C. H. Harison had been appointed secretary and treasurer of the Pullman Chamber of Commerce, but it does not state that he was physically present in “Pa‑louse country.” The only reference to Pa‑louse country is a comment about Spokane’s prosperity, made by F. P. Greene, and there is no mention of Harison being there or any event linking him to the location within the 30‑day window before the publication date (1910‑12‑16). Therefore we have insufficient evidence to confirm his presence at that location during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false } ] }, { "document_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-08-a-i0001", "media": { "publication_title": "Putnam County Herald", "time_period": "1903-1922", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-test-en.tsv", "date": "1920-01-08", "language": "en", "text": "B. M. JOHNSON MFG. CO.\nA new manufacturing enterprise\nwith an authorized capital stock of\n$25,000, promoted by Benton M. John\nson and incorporated for the purpose\nof manufacturing extracts, spices,\ndrugs and grocery sundries, has been\norganized in Jackson. An applica\ntion for a charter was made in the\noffice of the county court clerk yes\nterday by the stockholders of the\ncorporation, styled the B. M. Johnson\nManufacturing Company.\nThe industry will be completely\nestablished, equipped with all neces\nsary facilities and in operation by the\nfirst of February, it was stated by\nBenton M. Johnson yesterday. The\nplant will employ between 30 and 50\ngirls, it is stated, and five travel ng\nsalesmen. Mr. Johnson, the promot\ner of the enterprise, has been travel\ning for a well-known drug concern\nfor 17 years and the stockholders of\nthe Jackson corporation believe that\nthe locab plant will be successfully\npromoted under his direction.—Jack-\nson Sun.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-08-a-i0001-NIL_benton_m_john_son", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Benton M. Johnson", "Benton M. John\nson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-08-a-i0001_Q985409", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q985409", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Jackson" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that the company “has been organized in Jackson.” Organizing a business typically requires the promoter’s physical presence at the site to sign documents, approve capital, and establish operations. The text also notes that Mr. Benton M. Johnson is the promoter of the enterprise, implying he was there to carry out those organizational tasks. Since the publication date is 1920‑01‑08, any such activity would have occurred before that date. Therefore there is explicit evidence that Benton M. Johnson was physically present in Jackson prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that the B. M. Johnson Manufacturing Company was “organized in Jackson,” indicating the corporate entity’s legal presence there. It also notes that Benton M. Johnson is the promoter and that he has been traveling for 17 years, but it does not provide any explicit statement or contextual cue that he himself was physically present in Jackson during the 30‑day window ending on 1920‑01‑08 (i.e., between 1920‑01‑09 and 1920‑01‑08). The only mention of his presence is that he “has been traveling for a well‑known drug concern,” which does not specify Jackson. Because the text lacks direct evidence of Benton M. Johnson’s physical presence in Jackson within the required timeframe, we cannot confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-08-a-i0001-NIL_mr_johnson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mr. Johnson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn89058133-1920-01-08-a-i0001_Q985409", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q985409", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Jackson" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that the B. M. Johnson Manufacturing Company “has been organized in Jackson” and that Mr. Johnson is identified as the promoter of the enterprise. Incorporation requires a corporate officer to be physically present at the location where the charter is filed, so it is reasonable to infer that Mr. Johnson was in Jackson when the company was incorporated. This occurrence would have taken place before the publication date (1920‑01‑08). Therefore there is explicit evidence of his presence in Jackson prior to the document’s release.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “the industry will be completely established… it was stated by Benton M. Johnson yesterday,” but it does not explicitly say that Mr. Johnson himself was physically present in Jackson at that time. The only reference to Jackson is the phrase “has been organized in Jackson,” which refers to the corporate entity, not necessarily to Mr. Johnson’s presence there. Since no sentence directly indicates Mr. Johnson’s physical presence in Jackson within the 30‑day window (1920‑01‑09 to 1920‑01‑08), we cannot confirm his presence based on the text.", "CORRECT": false } ] }, { "document_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009", "media": { "publication_title": "Tabor City Tribune", "time_period": "1946-1991", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1960-05-18", "language": "en", "text": "Mediterranean Trip\nPlanned For Fowler\nNeal L. Fowler. Aviation\nElectrician Second Clas USN,\nson of Mr. Worth Fowler of\nRoute I, Tabor City is present\nly at home on thirty days\nleave.\nFowler has been in the Navy\nabout three years and will re\nport to Helicopter Anti-Sub\nmarine Squadron Three at Nor\nfolk Virginia. He will leave in\nJune for a two months cruise\nof the Mediterranean on a\nMid-Shipman cruise.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Fowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q586130", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q586130", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tabor City" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “Neal L. Fowler … son of Mr. Worth Fowler of Route I, Tabor City is present ly at home on thirty days leave.” This indicates that Fowler was physically in Tabor City (at his residence) prior to the date of publication (1960‑05‑18). The mention of a planned June departure for a Mediterranean cruise further supports that he had been in Tabor City before leaving. Therefore, there is explicit evidence of his presence at the specified location before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that Neal L. Fowler is “present at home in Tabor City on thirty days leave,” but it does not provide a specific date for this stay. The publication date is 1960‑05‑18, and the required window is from 1960‑04‑18 to 1960‑05‑18. Since no explicit date falls within that interval in the text, we cannot confirm that Fowler was physically present in Tabor City during the 30‑day period preceding the publication. Therefore there is insufficient evidence to satisfy the condition.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_neal_l_fowler_aviation_electrician_second_clas_usn", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Neal L. Fowler. Aviation\nElectrician Second Clas USN" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q586130", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q586130", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tabor City" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “Neal L. Fowler … son of Mr. Worth Fowler of Route I, Tabor City is present ly at home on thirty days leave.” This indicates that Neal was physically residing in Tabor City during a 30‑day leave period before the publication date (1960‑05‑18). Therefore there is direct evidence of his presence at the specified location prior to the document’s date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “Neal L. Fowler… is present ly at home on thirty days leave,” indicating he was physically in Tabor City for a 30‑day period. However, the text does not provide any specific date or time reference for this stay. The publication date is 1960‑05‑18, so the required window of presence would be from 1960‑04‑19 to 1960‑05‑18. Without an explicit date that falls within this interval in the text, we cannot confirm that his 30‑day leave occurred during the relevant timeframe. Therefore there is no direct evidence of his presence at Tabor City within the required window.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_mr_worth_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mr. Worth Fowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q586130", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q586130", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tabor City" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document identifies Neal L. Fowler as “the son of Mr. Worth Fowler of Route I, Tabor City.” This indicates that Mr. Worth Fowler’s origin or residence is associated with Tabor City, but it does not state that he was physically present in the city at any specific time before 1960‑05‑18. The only mention of presence (“is present ly at home”) refers to Neal himself, not his father. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that Mr. Worth Fowler was physically in Tabor City prior to the publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “son of Mr. Worth Fowler … is present ly at home on thirty days leave” in Tabor City, but it does not explicitly say that Mr. Worth Fowler himself was physically present there. No date or explicit mention of his presence within the 30‑day window (1960‑04‑18 to 1960‑05‑18) is provided. Therefore we cannot confirm his presence at Tabor City during that period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_mr_worth_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mr. Worth Fowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_route_i", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Route I" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “Neal L. Fowler … son of Mr. Worth Fowler **of Route I, Tabor City** is present ly at home on thirty days leave.” This phrasing indicates that Mr. Worth Fowler himself was physically present in his home, which is located in Tabor City and is part of Route I. Therefore there is direct evidence that he was at the specified location before the document’s publication date (1960‑05‑18).", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document mentions “Mr. Worth Fowler” only as the father of Neal L. Fowler and identifies him with “Route I, Tabor City,” but it does not state that Mr. Worth Fowler himself was physically present at Route I during any time period. The only explicit presence claim is about Neal L. Fowler being “presently at home on thirty days leave.” Since there is no direct evidence that Mr. Worth Fowler was in the location within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1960‑05‑18), the criteria for a TRUE classification are not met.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_neal_l_fowler_aviation_electrician_second_clas_usn", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Neal L. Fowler. Aviation\nElectrician Second Clas USN" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_route_i", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Route I" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage identifies Neal L. Fowler as the son of Mr. Worth Fowler “of Route I, Tabor City.” This indicates that his father’s residence or origin is in that area, but it does not state that Neal himself was physically present at Route I. The text only notes that Neal is “presently at home” on thirty days leave, implying he remains in the local area (likely Tabor City) rather than traveling to Route I. Since there is no explicit mention of Neal visiting or being located at Route I before the publication date, we cannot confirm his presence there.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that Neal L. Fowler “is present ly at home on thirty days leave,” indicating he was at his residence, not at Route I. There is no mention of him being physically at Route I during any time period, and the only date reference (“on thirty days leave”) does not specify a location other than home. Since the required presence at Route I within 30 days before the publication date (1960‑05‑18) is absent in the text, we conclude that the evidence does not support his presence there.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Fowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_route_i", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Route I" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The text identifies Neal L. Fowler as a son of Mr. Worth Fowler who is “of Route I, Tabor City.” This indicates the father’s origin or residence, not the son’s own location. The passage does not state that Neal himself was physically present at Route I; it only mentions his family background and his current status (presently at home on leave). Since there is no explicit evidence of Fowler being at Route I before the publication date, we cannot confirm his presence.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “Neal L. Fowler … is present ly at home on thirty days leave.” This indicates his physical presence was at home, not at the location named “Route I”. The phrase “of Route I, Tabor City” merely identifies Mr. Worth Fowler’s origin or affiliation; it does not describe a visit to that place by Neal L. Fowler himself. There is no explicit mention of Fowler being physically present at Route I within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1960‑05‑18). Therefore, the required evidence for his presence at Route I in that timeframe is absent.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Fowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q49231", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q49231", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Nor\nfolk Virginia" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that Fowler “will report” to Helicopter Anti‑Submarine Squadron Three at Norfolk, Virginia, indicating an upcoming deployment. It does not provide any evidence that he had already been physically present in Norfolk prior to the document’s publication date (1960‑05‑18). The only mention of his location is a future plan; there is no reference to him being there earlier. Therefore we cannot conclude that Fowler was at Norfolk, Virginia before 1960‑05‑18.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document mentions that Fowler “will report to Helicopter Anti‑Submarine Squadron Three at Norfolk Virginia,” indicating an upcoming deployment, but it provides no explicit statement or date of his actual presence there. The only temporal reference is a future plan (“He will leave in June”), which falls outside the 30‑day window ending on 1960‑05‑18 (i.e., before 1960‑04‑19). Since no evidence places Fowler physically at Norfolk Virginia within that timeframe, we cannot confirm his presence. Therefore the correct classification is FALSE.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Fowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q4918", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q4918", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Mediterranean" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document describes a planned Mediterranean cruise for Fowler, stating “He will leave in June for a two months cruise of the Mediterranean.” This indicates an upcoming travel plan but does not provide any indication that Fowler had already been physically present in the Mediterranean before the publication date (1960‑05‑18). There is no mention of prior visits, stays, or evidence of presence. Therefore, based on the text alone, there is no support for Fowler being at the Mediterranean location prior to the document’s date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that Fowler “will leave in June for a two months cruise of the Mediterranean,” indicating a planned trip but providing no explicit date or evidence that he was actually present at the Mediterranean during the 30‑day window ending on 1960‑05‑18. No mention of a specific date, arrival, or presence within that timeframe appears in the text. Therefore there is no direct evidence that Fowler was physically present at the Mediterranean location within the required period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_mr_worth_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mr. Worth Fowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q49231", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q49231", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Nor\nfolk Virginia" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document identifies Neal L. Fowler as the individual who will report to Helicopter Anti‑Submarine Squadron Three in Norfolk, Virginia. It also notes that Mr. Worth Fowler is “the son of” and is located at home in Tabor City (Route I). There is no statement indicating that Mr. Worth Fowler himself was physically present in Norfolk, Virginia, nor any mention of his travel or presence there before the publication date of 1960‑05‑18. Therefore, based on the text alone, we cannot confirm his presence at that location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “Neal L. Fowler… son of Mr. Worth Fowler … is present ly at home on thirty days leave.” This indicates that the father, Mr. Worth Fowler, is not physically present; it merely notes his son’s presence. The only mention of Norfolk Virginia in the text refers to Neal L. Fowler’s future deployment (“He will leave in June for a two months cruise… at Norfolk Virginia”), which does not indicate Mr. Worth Fowler’s presence there. There is no explicit statement that Mr. Worth Fowler was physically present in Norfolk Virginia within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1960‑05‑18). Therefore, the evidence does not support his presence at that location during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_neal_l_fowler_aviation_electrician_second_clas_usn", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Neal L. Fowler. Aviation\nElectrician Second Clas USN" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q4918", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q4918", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Mediterranean" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document describes Neal L. Fowler’s upcoming travel plans: he will “leave in June for a two months cruise of the Mediterranean.” This indicates that the trip is scheduled for the future and does not provide any indication that he had already been to the Mediterranean before the publication date (1960‑05‑18). No prior mention of his presence, visits, or activities in the Mediterranean appears in the text. Therefore there is no evidence supporting his physical presence at the location before the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document mentions Neal L. Fowler’s upcoming travel: “He will leave in June for a two months cruise of the Mediterranean on a Mid‑Shipman cruise.” This indicates a planned trip, but it does not state that he was actually present at the Mediterranean during any specific time period. Moreover, no date or explicit presence statement falls within the 30‑day window ending on 1960‑05‑18 (i.e., between 1960‑04‑19 and 1960‑05‑18). Since there is no direct evidence of his physical presence at the Mediterranean in that timeframe, we cannot confirm it. Therefore the correct classification is FALSE.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_neal_l_fowler_aviation_electrician_second_clas_usn", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Neal L. Fowler. Aviation\nElectrician Second Clas USN" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q49231", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q49231", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Nor\nfolk Virginia" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that Neal L. Fowler “will report to Helicopter Anti‑Submarine Squadron Three at Norfolk Virginia.” This indicates a planned future action rather than an actual past presence. There is no mention of him having already arrived, been stationed there, or being physically present in Norfolk before the publication date (1960‑05‑18). Consequently, the text provides no evidence that he was at Norfolk Virginia prior to that date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that Neal L. Fowler “will report to Helicopter Anti‑Submarine Squadron Three at Norfolk Virginia,” indicating an upcoming deployment, but it does not provide any explicit evidence that he was physically present in Norfolk during the 30‑day window ending on 1960‑05‑18 (i.e., between 1960‑04‑19 and 1960‑05‑18). The text only mentions his planned departure to the Mediterranean in June, which falls outside that timeframe. Since there is no direct statement of his presence at Norfolk within the required period, we cannot confirm his physical presence.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009-NIL_mr_worth_fowler", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Mr. Worth Fowler" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-05-18-a-i0009_Q4918", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q4918", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Mediterranean" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that Mr. Worth Fowler “will leave in June for a two months cruise of the Mediterranean.” This indicates his planned departure is scheduled for later in 1960, after the publication date of 1960‑05‑18. The text does not mention any prior presence or travel to the Mediterranean before that date; it only notes his current location (Norfolk Virginia) and upcoming plans. Therefore there is no evidence that Mr. Worth Fowler was physically present in the Mediterranean before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that Mr. Worth Fowler will “leave in June for a two months cruise of the Mediterranean.” The publication date is 1960‑05‑18, so the relevant 30‑day window is from 1960‑04‑18 to 1960‑05‑18. The text does not provide any explicit date or statement that Mr. Worth Fowler was physically present in the Mediterranean during this period; it only indicates a future departure in June, which falls outside the window. Therefore there is no evidence of his presence at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn84020750-1840-11-14-a-i0001", "media": { "publication_title": "The North-Carolinian", "time_period": "1839-1861", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1840-11-14", "language": "en", "text": "A NEW SCHOOL.\nO N Monday the 5th of October, the subscriber\nwnl open in this town, a school for boys\nwhere the various branches of English and Classical\nstudies will be taught. The charge tor Tuition\nwill be af 10 25, per term, for all engaged in Classi\ncal studies and the higher branches of English \"or\nS41 per annum. For fhe ordinary branches of En\nglish studies the charge will be $8 25 per term,\ntuition in all cases to be paid in advance, and no\nstudent received for less than a term. The year\nwill commence on tho 5th of October, and close\nearly in August, with no intervening vacation ex\ncept an occasional recess of a few days. No deduc\ntion will be made for absence unless by special\nagreement. - Having taken a commodious house,\nthe subscriber will accommodate a number of board\ners at SI40 per annum, including lodging, room\nfuel and lights. SIMEON COLTON. ’\nFayetteville, August 13, 1840. 76-tf\n*** Fayetteville Observer and Wilmington Ad-\nxertiscr will please copy four weeks.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn84020750-1840-11-14-a-i0001-NIL_simeon_colton", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "SIMEON COLTON" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn84020750-1840-11-14-a-i0001_Q331104", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q331104", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Fayetteville" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is dated “Fayetteville, August 13, 1840,” indicating the publication location and date. The text states that the subscriber “Having taken a commodious house” in Fayetteville will accommodate boarders, and it ends with the signature “SIMEON COLTON.” This implies that Simeon Colton owned or rented a residence in Fayetteville at the time of writing, which is before the document’s publication date (November 14, 1840). Therefore there is explicit evidence that he was physically present in Fayetteville prior to the publication.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states “SIMEON COLTON. ’ Fayetteville, August 13, 1840.” This indicates the person’s presence in Fayetteville on 13 August 1840. The required window for presence is the 30 days preceding the publication date of 1840‑11‑14, i.e., from 15 October 1840 to 14 November 1840. August 13 falls outside this interval (more than two months earlier). No other mention in the text places SIMEON COLTON in Fayetteville within that window. Therefore there is no explicit evidence of his presence at Fayetteville during the required period.", "CORRECT": false } ] }, { "document_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002", "media": { "publication_title": "Pullman Herald", "time_period": "1888-1989", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1910-09-16", "language": "en", "text": "THE NORTHWEST\nCaptain T. D. Bloni, prominent in\nshipping circles and head of a codfish\ncompany, was found in Wright park,\nin the heart of the city of Tacotna,\nlast, week, with his throat cut. He will\nprobably die. It Is believed he was at\ntacked by a robber while on the way\nto the home of a friend. The attack is\nsupposed to have been made some\ntime before midnight and Blom is be\nlieved to have lain in the park all\nnight. When found his condition was\ndesperate. Several square feet of\nsod were covered with blood and\nthere were indications of a struggle.\nIn a fire which desrroyed the home\nof Jos. C. Wendell located in the sub\nurbs of Portland, Myrtle Wendell,\naged 2 years, was burned to death,\nand Laura Ellis, a domestic, aged IS\nyears, was so badly burned that she\ndied a few minutes after she reached\nthe hospital. It is believed the fire\nstarted from the explosion of a gas\noline stove. None of the members of\nthe family were home when the fire\nbroke out and it was some time be\nfore the nearest neighbors could\nreach the scene, it was then too late\nto save either of the victims.\nTwo journeyman plumbers out of\na job held up and shot Charles\nJeakel, a horseshoer of Lewiston,\nIdaho, through the neck at. Marshal\nJunction atabout 8 o'clock Saturday\nnight, securing $35 and inflicting a\nserious wound. The thugs fired three\nhots at close range at Jeakel, but one\ntaking effect, the other two passing\nthrough the victim’s coat at the\nshoulder. Offering resistance to com\nmands to stand and deliver caused\nthe use of firearms. Jeakel’s flesh\nand clothes were powder burnt.\nValuable Indian lands on the Yak\nima Indian reservation, which were\nallotted to non-oompetents or held\nfor heirs of dead indians, will be\nsold by the government on September\n26 and October 31. The sale will he\nmade under supervision of S. A. Al.\nA’oung, the agent in charge.\nJudge and Mrs. II. E. Canfield\nwere tendered a farewell reception\nby the members of the Masonic fra\nternities of Colfax on the eve of their\ndeparture for Spokane last week.\nJudge Canfield was presented with a\ngold-headed cane.\nThe property of the Deschutes\nIrrigation and Power Co., in Oregon,\nis to be sold at foreclosure sale, the\nbondholders having just secured an\norder for the sale from the circuit\ncourt in Portland. The claims against\nthe company aggregate $000,0 00.\n..J. H. Hildebrant was killed and\ntwo Finlanders were seriously injur\ned by a premature explosion in the\n•Mattie Ferguson mine at Basin, Mon\ntana, Thursday. Hilderbrant had just\nlighted the fus*l but did not have time\nto get away before the explosion oc\ncurred.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_j_h_hildebrant", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "J. H. Hildebrant", "Hilderbrant" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q967057", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q967057", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Basin, Mon\ntana" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article reports that “J. H. Hildebrant was killed … by a premature explosion in the Mattie Ferguson mine at Basin, Mon tana, Thursday.” This statement indicates that he was physically present at Basin, Mon tana on the day of the incident (Thursday). The publication date is 1910‑09‑16, which falls after that Thursday. Therefore there is explicit evidence in the text that Hildebrant was at the specified location before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The article reports that “J. H. Hildebrant was killed and two Finlanders were seriously injured by a premature explosion in the Mattie Ferguson mine at Basin, Mon tana, Thursday.” The phrase indicates that he was physically present at Basin, Mon tana on that day to light the fuse before the explosion. Since the document’s publication date is 1910‑09‑16, the relevant time window for presence is from 1910‑08‑17 through 1910‑09‑16. A Thursday falling on or within that period (e.g., 1910‑09‑15) satisfies the requirement. Therefore, the text provides explicit evidence of his presence at the specified location during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_myrtle_wendell", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Myrtle Wendell" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q6106", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q6106", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Portland" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Myrtle Wendell … was burned to death” in a fire that destroyed the home of Jos. C. Wendell located in the suburbs of Portland. This indicates that Myrtle’s residence, and thus her physical presence, was in Portland at the time of the incident. Since the document is dated 1910‑09‑16, the event (the fire) must have occurred before that date, meaning she was indeed present in Portland prior to publication.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The article reports that Myrtle Wendell was burned to death at her home in the suburbs of Portland, but it provides no date for this event or any indication that she was physically present in Portland within the 30‑day window ending on 1910‑09‑16. The only mention of a location is “suburbs of Portland,” which does not specify a temporal anchor. Since there is no explicit statement linking Myrtle’s presence to Portland with a date that falls inside the required period, we cannot confirm her presence in Portland during the specified window.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_j_h_hildebrant", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "J. H. Hildebrant", "Hilderbrant" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q6106", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q6106", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Portland" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document contains a statement that “J. H. Hilderbrant was killed and two Finlanders were seriously injured by a premature explosion in the Mattie Ferguson mine at Basin, Montana.” This indicates his presence in Montana, not Portland. The only mention of Portland is regarding the Deschutes Irrigation and Power Co.’s foreclosure sale and a farewell reception for Judge Canfield, but no reference links J. H. Hilderbrant to Portland or any visit there. Since the text provides no evidence that he was physically present in Portland before the publication date (1910‑09‑16), we conclude that his presence at that location is unsupported.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains a reference to “J. H. Hildebrant was killed … by a premature explosion in the Mattie Ferguson mine at Basin, Montana.” This event is tied to a location (Basin, Montana) and does not mention Portland or any activity of Hildebrant there. Later sections discuss property sales in Oregon but do not link them to Hildebrant’s presence. No sentence in the text indicates that J. H. Hildebrant was physically present in Portland during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16). Because there is no explicit evidence of his presence at Portland within that timeframe, we cannot confirm it.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_jeakel", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Jeakel" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q3457242", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q3457242", "loc_mentions_list": [ "the Yak\nima Indian reservation" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage reports that Charles Jeakel is a “horseshoer of Lewiston, Idaho” who was shot at Marshal Junction. It contains no mention of him traveling to or being present on the Yakima Indian reservation. The only reference to the Yakima Indian reservation concerns valuable lands and their sale, with no link to Jeakel’s activities. Therefore there is no textual evidence that Jeakel was physically present at the Yakima Indian reservation before the document’s publication date (1910‑09‑16).", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that Charles Jeakel, a horseshoer from Lewiston, Idaho, was shot at Marshal Junction on Saturday night. It does not mention Jeakel being anywhere near the Yakima Indian reservation, nor does it provide any date or location linking him to that site within the 30‑day window preceding the publication (1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16). The only reference to the Yakima Indian reservation concerns land sales and an agent, with no mention of Jeakel’s presence. Therefore there is no evidence that Jeakel was physically present at the Yakima Indian reservation during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_jeakel", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Jeakel" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q505539", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q505539", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Lewiston,\nIdaho" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Charles Jeakel, a horseshoer of Lewiston, Idaho, … was shot … at Marshal Junction.” The phrase “horseshoer of Lewiston” indicates his occupation and residence in that city, while the incident occurring “at Marshal Junction” implies he was physically present there at the time of the shooting. Since the event is described as happening on a Saturday night before the document’s publication date (1910‑09‑16), Jeakel was indeed in Lewiston prior to that date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states: “Two journeyman plumbers … shot Charles Jeakel, a horseshoer of Lewiston, Idaho, through the neck at Marshal Junction at about 8 o’clock Saturday night.” This indicates that Jeakel was physically present in Lewiston (the location) when the shooting occurred. The event is dated as “Saturday night,” and the document’s publication date is 1910‑09‑16, which falls on a Saturday. Therefore the shooting took place within the 30‑day window preceding the publication (from 1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16). The text provides explicit evidence of Jeakel’s presence in Lewiston during that period, satisfying the requirement.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_judge_canfield", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Judge Canfield" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q824", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q824", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Oregon" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Judge and Mrs. II. E. Canfield were tendered a farewell reception by the members of the Masonic fraternities of Colfax on the eve of their departure for Spokane last week.” This indicates that Judge Canfield was physically present in Colfax, Oregon, at some point before the document’s publication date (1910‑09‑16). The text provides no contradictory evidence suggesting he was elsewhere. Therefore we can conclude with certainty that he was indeed in Oregon prior to 1910‑09‑16.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text reports that “Judge and Mrs. II. E. Canfield were tendered a farewell reception … on the eve of their departure for Spokane last week.” This indicates they were in some location (Colfax) and about to leave, but it does not explicitly state that Judge Canfield was physically present in Oregon during the 30‑day window ending on 1910‑09‑16. The only reference to Oregon is the mention of Spokane as a destination, which implies they were leaving Oregon rather than being there at the time of the event. Since the task requires explicit evidence of presence in Oregon within the specified period and no such statement appears, we conclude that the condition is not met.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_captain_t_d_bloni", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Captain T. D. Bloni" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q7060018", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q7060018", "loc_mentions_list": [ "THE NORTHWEST" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document begins with the heading “THE NORTHWEST” and then describes Captain T. D. Bloni as having been found in Wright Park within the city of Tacotna. The text does not state that he was physically present at a place called “THE NORTHWEST”; it merely uses the heading as a title or geographic reference, without indicating his presence there. Since no explicit mention of him being at THE NORTHWEST before the publication date (1910‑09‑16) is found, we cannot confirm his physical presence at that location.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text begins with a heading “THE NORTHWEST” followed by the sentence “Captain T. D. Bloni, prominent in shipping circles … was found in Wright park…”. This indicates that Captain Bloni was physically present at Wright Park (in Tacotna) during the timeframe referenced (“last week”). However, the heading “THE NORTHWEST” is a section title and does not itself denote a location where he was present. The passage contains no explicit statement that he was in or near “THE NORTHWEST” (e.g., a place name, geographic area, or specific site) within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date of 1910‑09‑16. Therefore there is no direct evidence that Captain T. D. Bloni was physically present at “THE NORTHWEST” during the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_charles_jeakel", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Charles\nJeakel" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q505539", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q505539", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Lewiston,\nIdaho" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Charles Jeakel, a horseshoer of Lewiston, Idaho, … was shot … at Marshal Junction.” This indicates that he was physically present in Lewiston (at the location of Marshal Junction) when the incident occurred. The event is dated as Saturday night before the document’s publication date (1910‑09‑16), so his presence predates the publication. Therefore there is explicit evidence that Charles Jeakel was at Lewiston, Idaho prior to the document’s release.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage notes that “Charles Jeakel, a horseshoer of Lewiston, Idaho” was shot at Marshal Junction on Saturday night. It does not state that Marshal Junction is located in Lewiston, nor does it explicitly say that Charles Jeakel was physically present there within the 30‑day window (1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16). The only temporal reference (“Saturday night”) falls inside the required period, but the location is not identified as Lewiston and no explicit statement of his presence in that city within the window is provided. Therefore there is insufficient evidence to confirm that Charles Jeakel was physically present at Lewiston, Idaho during the specified timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_judge_canfield", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Judge Canfield" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q187805", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q187805", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Spokane" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Judge and Mrs. II. E. Canfield were tendered a farewell reception by the members of the Masonic fraternities of Colfax on the eve of their departure for Spokane last week.” A farewell reception implies a gathering in the place where it is being held, which would be Spokane (the location of the Masonic fraternity’s presence). The wording “on the eve of their departure for Spokane” indicates that they were already there before leaving. Therefore Judge Canfield was physically present in Spokane prior to the document’s publication date of 1910‑09‑16.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document notes that “Judge and Mrs. II. E. Canfield were tendered a farewell reception … on the eve of their departure for Spokane last week.” This indicates they were in a location (likely Portland or another city) preparing to leave, not that they had already arrived in Spokane. The text also mentions “Judge Canfield was presented with a gold‑headed cane,” which is part of the reception but does not place him in Spokane. No other passage describes Judge Canfield being physically present in Spokane during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16). Therefore there is no explicit evidence that he was in Spokane within that timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_laura_ellis", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Laura Ellis" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q6106", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q6106", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Portland" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “In a fire which desrroyed the home of Jos. C. Wendell located in the sub‑urbs of Portland, Myrtle Wendell … was burned to death, and Laura Ellis, a domestic, aged IS years, was so badly burned that she died a few minutes after she reached the hospital.” This indicates that Laura Ellis lived at a residence in Portland’s suburbs, where the fire occurred. The fact that she “reached the hospital” implies she was physically present in Portland (at her home and later at the hospital) before the incident resulted in her death. Since the document is dated 1910‑09‑16, this presence must have occurred prior to that date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states that “In a fire which destroyed the home of Jos. C. Wendell located in the sub‑urbs of Portland, Myrtle Wendell … and Laura Ellis … was so badly burned that she died a few minutes after she reached the hospital.” This indicates that Laura Ellis was at the home (in Portland) when the fire occurred, but it does not provide any date or time reference for that event. The document’s only dated information is about events in September 1910 and earlier dates such as “last week” relative to a publication date of 1910‑09‑16. Because there is no explicit mention that Laura Ellis was physically present in Portland within the 30‑day window (1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16), we cannot confirm her presence with the required evidence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_jos_c_wendell", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Jos. C. Wendell" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q6106", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q6106", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Portland" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article reports that “the home of Jos. C. Wendell located in the sub‑urbs of Portland” was destroyed by fire. This indicates that Jos. C. Wendell lived at a residence within Portland’s suburbs before the document’s publication date (1910‑09‑16). Residence implies physical presence at the location, satisfying the condition for classification as TRUE.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that Jos. C. Wendell’s home was “located in the sub‑urbs of Portland,” indicating a residence there, but it does not provide any explicit statement that he himself was physically present at Portland during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16). The text merely describes his home’s location; it does not mention him being in Portland, attending an event, or any activity there within that timeframe. Therefore there is no direct evidence of his presence at the specified location during the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_charles_jeakel", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Charles\nJeakel" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_marshal_junction", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Marshal\nJunction" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article reports that “Two journeyman plumbers out of a job held up and shot **Charles Jeakel**, a horseshoer of Lewiston, Idaho, through the neck at Marshal Junction at about 8 o’clock Saturday night.” The phrase “at Marshal Junction” indicates that Jeakel was physically present there when the shooting occurred. Since this event is described as happening on a Saturday before the document’s publication date (1910‑09‑16), it confirms his presence in that location prior to the date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage states that “Two journeyman plumbers … shot Charles Jeakel … through the neck **at Marshal Junction**.” The phrase “shot … at Marshal Junction” indicates that the shooting occurred there, meaning Charles Jeakel was physically present at that location when the incident took place. \n\nThe article is dated 1910‑09‑16 (Friday). The event described as occurring “Saturday night” would be on 1910‑09‑15, which falls within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (from 1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16). \n\nThus there is explicit textual evidence that Charles Jeakel was present at Marshal Junction during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_captain_t_d_bloni", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Captain T. D. Bloni" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q199797", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q199797", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Tacotna" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage explicitly states that “Captain T. D. Bloni … was found in Wright park, in the heart of the city of Tacotna, last week.” This indicates his physical presence at Tacotna before the article’s publication date (1910‑09‑16). The phrase “last week” implies the event occurred within a timeframe preceding the publication date. Therefore there is direct evidence that Captain T. D. Bloni was present in Tacotna prior to 1910‑09‑16.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The article states that “Captain T. D. Bloni … was found in Wright park, in the heart of the city of Tacotna, last week.” The publication date is 1910‑09‑16, so the timeframe for presence is from 1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16. “Last week” falls within that window (approximately 1910‑09‑09 to 1910‑09‑15). The text explicitly links the person’s presence at Tacotna with a specific time period, satisfying the requirement for a direct evidence of presence within the required 30‑day interval. Therefore the claim is supported.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_j_h_hildebrant", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "J. H. Hildebrant", "Hilderbrant" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q824", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q824", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Oregon" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document contains a single reference to J. H. Hilderbrant: “J. H. Hilderbrant was killed and two Finlanders were seriously injured by a premature explosion in the •Mattie Ferguson mine at Basin, Montana, Thursday.” This indicates that he was present in Montana (Basin) on the day of the incident, not in Oregon. The rest of the text discusses property sales in Oregon, but it does not mention J. H. Hilderbrant being there or any activity involving him in Oregon. Since no part of the passage provides evidence that he was physically present in Oregon before the publication date (1910‑09‑16), we conclude that the claim is unsupported.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document reports that J. H. Hilderbrant (spelled “J. H. Hilderbrant”) was killed by an explosion at the Mattie Ferguson mine in Basin, Montana. The location explicitly stated is “Basin, Montana,” which is in Montana, not Oregon. No other part of the text mentions Hilderbrant being in Oregon or any activity there during the relevant timeframe (the publication date is 1910‑09‑16, so we examine events from 1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16). Since the only reference to Hilderbrant’s presence is in Montana and there is no mention of him being in Oregon within that window, the evidence does not satisfy the requirement for his presence in Oregon. Therefore we conclude that he was not present at the specified location during the required period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_jeakel", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Jeakel" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_marshal_junction", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Marshal\nJunction" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article states that “Two journeyman plumbers … shot Charles Jeakel, a horseshoer of Lewiston, Idaho, through the neck **at Marshal Junction** at about 8 o’clock Saturday night.” This phrasing indicates that Jeakel was physically present at Marshal Junction when the shooting occurred. Since the article is dated September 16, 1910 and describes an event that took place on a preceding Saturday night, the presence of Jeakel at Marshal Junction predates the publication date. No part of the text contradicts this claim.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The article reports that “Two journeyman plumbers … shot Charles Jeakel … through the neck **at Marshal Junction** at about 8 o’clock Saturday night.” The phrase “Saturday night” indicates a specific day, and because the document is dated 1910‑09‑16 (the publication date), that Saturday falls on September 14, 1910. This date lies within the 30‑day window from 1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16. The sentence explicitly states Jeakel was present at Marshal Junction when he was shot, confirming his physical presence there during that period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002-NIL_judge_and_mrs_ii_e_canfield", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Judge and Mrs. II. E. Canfield" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-09-16-a-i0002_Q3457242", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q3457242", "loc_mentions_list": [ "the Yak\nima Indian reservation" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Judge and Mrs. II. E. Canfield were tendered a farewell reception by the members of the Masonic fraternities of Colfax on the eve of their departure for Spokane last week.” This indicates they were in Colfax, not at the Yakima Indian reservation. The text contains no other reference to these individuals being present or visiting the Yakima reservation before the publication date (1910‑09‑16). Therefore there is no evidence that they were physically present at that location prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text states that “Judge and Mrs. II. E. Canfield were tendered a farewell reception … on the eve of their departure for Spokane last week.” This indicates they were in Colfax, not at the Yakima Indian reservation. The only mention of the Yakima Indian reservation concerns land sales under supervision by S. A. Al’oung; there is no reference to Judge or Mrs. II. E. Canfield being present there. Since no evidence places them at that location within the 30‑day window (1910‑08‑17 to 1910‑09‑16), we cannot confirm their presence.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001", "media": { "publication_title": "The Independent", "time_period": "1908-1936", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1930-05-16", "language": "en", "text": "A JAIL THREAT\nFOR ATTORNEY\nC. E. THOMPSON\n\"If I thought you meant what\nyou said, I’d throw you in jail for\ncontempt of court.” it was EHz-\naheth City's strong-headed Trial\nJudge Phil Sawyer, speaking, and\nhe was speaking to C. E. Thomp\nson. speeial counsel for the City\nof Elizabeth City and partner in\n• he law firm of Thompson & Wil\nson. Tlii'- happened in Itceordcr’s\nCourt Saturday morning and\nElizabeth Citizens have not yet\nbeeontc aecu^tomed to the thought\nof Everett Thompson occupying a\ncell in the county Jail.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001-NIL_everett_thompson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Everett Thompson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001_Q1018467", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1018467", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Elizabeth" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document identifies C. E. Thompson as “special counsel for the City of Elizabeth City” and notes that he was present at a hearing held in “Itceordcr’s Court.” Being a city‑based attorney who appears before the court indicates that he was physically present in Elizabeth City (the jurisdiction of the court) prior to the publication date. The text does not merely state his affiliation; it explicitly places him in the courtroom, which is located in Elizabeth City. Therefore there is clear evidence that Everett Thompson was at the specified location before 1930‑05‑16.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document discusses a courtroom event involving “C. E. Thompson,” but the person of interest is “Everett Thompson.” The text contains no mention that Everett Thompson was physically present in Elizabeth during the 30‑day period ending on 1930‑05‑16 (i.e., between 1930‑04‑16 and 1930‑05‑16). There is no date or explicit statement linking Everett to that location within the required window. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence of his presence at Elizabeth in the specified timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001-NIL_c_e_thomp_son_speeial_counsel_for_the_city_of_elizabeth_city_and_partner_in_he_law_firm_of_thompson_wil_son", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "C. E. Thomp\nson. speeial counsel for the City\nof Elizabeth City and partner in\n• he law firm of Thompson & Wil\nson" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001_Q1018467", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1018467", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Elizabeth" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “C. E. Thompson, special counsel for the City of Elizabeth City … was speaking” to Judge Phil Sawyer in Itceordcr’s Court on a Saturday morning. Being physically present at the courtroom and addressing the judge indicates that he was in Elizabeth (the city) before the publication date of 1930‑05‑16. No evidence suggests otherwise; the text directly links him to the location.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "TRUE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “he was speaking to C. E. Thompson” while the event took place in “Elizabeth City’s Court on Saturday morning.” This indicates that C. E. Thompson was physically present at the Elizabeth City (Elizabeth) location during a Saturday morning session, which falls within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date of 1930‑05‑16 (i.e., from 1930‑04‑16 to 1930‑05‑16). The text explicitly links the person’s presence with the location and a specific time, satisfying the requirement for a direct evidence of presence. Therefore, we conclude that C. E. Thompson was indeed present at Elizabeth within the required period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001-NIL_attorney_c_e_thompson", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "ATTORNEY\nC. E. THOMPSON" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001_Q1018467", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1018467", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Elizabeth" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document describes a trial held in “Itceordcr’s Court” on Saturday morning, with Judge Phil Sawyer speaking directly to C. E. Thompson. The phrasing indicates that Thompson was present at the courtroom during the proceedings, which took place in Elizabeth City (the location of the court). Since the event occurred before the publication date of 1930‑05‑16, this provides direct evidence that C. E. Thompson was physically present in Elizabeth City prior to that date.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document mentions that Judge Phil Sawyer was speaking to C. E. Thompson in “Itceordcr’s Court” on a Saturday morning, implying the attorney was present at the courtroom in Elizabeth. However, the text does not provide an explicit date for this hearing; it only states the day of the week (“Saturday”) without linking it to a specific calendar date within the 30‑day window ending on 1930‑05‑16 (i.e., between 1930‑04‑17 and 1930‑05‑16). Because there is no concrete temporal evidence that the event occurred in that timeframe, we cannot confirm that C. E. Thompson was physically present at Elizabeth within the required window.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001-NIL_ehz_aheth_city_s_strong_headed_trial_judge_phil_sawyer", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "EHz-\naheth City's strong-headed Trial\nJudge Phil Sawyer" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83025812-1930-05-16-a-i0001_Q1018467", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1018467", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Elizabeth" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “it was EHz‑ aheth City's strong-headed Trial Judge Phil Sawyer, speaking, and he was speaking to C. E. Thompson.” This indicates the judge was physically present at the courtroom where the conversation took place. The text also references “Elizabeth Citizens” and “Itceordcr’s Court,” which are clearly tied to Elizabeth (the location). Since a judge who is speaking in a courtroom must be there, we have direct evidence that EHz‑ was in Elizabeth before the document’s publication date of 1930‑05‑16.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text mentions “EHz‑” only as part of the phrase “it was EHz‑ aheth City’s strong‑headed Trial Judge Phil Sawyer, speaking…”. This indicates that EHz‑ is associated with the judge but does not explicitly state that EHz‑ himself was present at Elizabeth. Moreover, the document contains no date or temporal marker that places this event within 30 days before the publication date (1930‑05‑16). Without a clear statement of both the person’s presence and a specific location tied to a recent timeframe, we cannot satisfy the criteria for TRUE.", "CORRECT": false } ] }, { "document_id": "sn88068010-1890-10-02-a-i0001", "media": { "publication_title": "Chariton Courier", "time_period": "1878-2025", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1890-10-02", "language": "en", "text": "Some Facts About the Approach\nof the Priests of Pallas.\nIt 19 with pleasure that we are en\nabled to announce to-day that Pallas\nAthene and her pries’ly attendants\nwill surely come to Kansas City,\nagain, thU year, with even more\nsplendor than has marked three\nformer visits of the goddess. There\nis little doubt that tbe attendance\nfrom tbis city will be large, as the\nrailroads have all granted a very low\nrate for the occasion. The spectacle\nof the goddess, and aud the splendor\nthat alwa}*s accompanies her, should\nbe seen by everyone. It is a pleas\nure that no one should deny himself.\nThe goddess and her priests have\nprepared the entertainment, and a\ncity in our midst has been selected\nfor its production. It is frep to\neverybody.\nThe goddess has maintained ber\nusual secrecy, this year, on the\nquestion of her theme. The subject\nis said to be of great simplicity and\ngrandeur, however, and it will as\nsuredly be illustrated in a splendid\nmanner. It is expected that Pallas\nwill arrive in New York with her\ntrain, about September 29, taking\nsix special coaches on tbe New York\nCentral road, direct to Kansas City.\nVisitors should reach the scene of\nthe grand entertainment not later\nthan 8 o’clock, on the evening of\nOctober 2.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn88068010-1890-10-02-a-i0001_Q37122", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q37122", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Pallas", "Pallas\nAthene" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88068010-1890-10-02-a-i0001_Q1384", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1384", "loc_mentions_list": [ "New York" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states: “It is expected that Pallas will arrive in New York with her train, about September 29, taking six special coaches on the New York Central road, direct to Kansas City.” This sentence explicitly indicates that Pallas (Athene) would be physically present in New York at a date prior to the document’s publication date of 1890‑10‑02. Therefore there is clear evidence of her presence in the specified location before the publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “It is expected that Pallas will arrive in New York with her train, about September 29.” This indicates an anticipated visit, not a confirmed presence. The text contains no explicit statement that Pallas was actually in New York during the 30‑day window (1890‑09‑02 to 1890‑10‑02). Since the requirement is for documented presence within that timeframe and only an expectation is mentioned, the criteria are not met. Therefore we classify the claim as false.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88068010-1890-10-02-a-i0001_Q37122", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q37122", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Pallas", "Pallas\nAthene" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88068010-1890-10-02-a-i0001_Q41819", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q41819", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Kansas City" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “It is expected that Pallas will arrive in New York with her train, about September 29, taking six special coaches on the New York Central road, direct to Kansas City.” Since September 29 falls before the document’s publication date of 1890‑10‑02, this indicates that Pallas (Athene) will be physically present in Kansas City prior to the publication. The text also explicitly mentions “again, this year” and references a visit to Kansas City, confirming her presence there within the same calendar year.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “Pallas will arrive in New York with her train, about September 29,” and notes that the train proceeds directly to Kansas City. However, it does **not** provide a date or explicit statement that Pallas herself was physically present in Kansas City within the 30‑day window (1890‑09‑02 to 1890‑10‑02). The only reference to Kansas City is the train’s route, not her arrival. Therefore there is no direct evidence that Pallas was at Kansas City during the required period.", "CORRECT": false } ] }, { "document_id": "sn84026272-1800-10-21-a-i0002", "media": { "publication_title": "Gazette of the United States, & Daily Advertiser", "time_period": "1776-1849", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1800-10-21", "language": "en", "text": "VIENNA, August 16.\nAs soon as ibe Adjutant of Buonaparte, Ci\ntizen Duroc, had arrived at Alti-Octtingeit\nor more properly, Bmuuiau, in Bavaria, and\nfrom thence bad sent a Courier on to thi*\nCn;y, Count larhrbach, or, according to oth\ners. Count Djctrichstem, was sent off to Brau-\nnau, accompanied only by u Secretary.—-\nj 1 he report that ■ Citizen Duroc wftj toga\nj on to Vienna, and that he only waited at\nj Br.iuniu trll he obtained passes, isintirely\nfalse. It is now known that it was agreed'\nI on at \"Paris, between the Chief Consul and\nj Count St.-Julien, that a conference aud the\nj necessary diplomatic proceedings should take\nj place between Duroc and an Auff.x'an Plen-*\nj ipotentiary at Braunao, on Che Bavarian\nI frontier.. It is now asserted that at Brennan\nJ the preliminaries of peace were signed, or\naccording to fame the ratifications of the\npreliminaries exchanged. Citizen: Duroc\nset oilt immediately for Paris, so that there\nis no longer a doubt-of ;* (reace between\nFrance and Austria. The En., iso embassa-\n■•dor, Lord ‘Minto, has lent off a. Conner to\nhis • Court- with an account of what has pas\nsed, Some affirm that the convention with\nEngland is ratified, but unde* such stipula\ntions that it is no obstacle .to\nwith the proclamation by which my\ngrandson shall have been recognised\nKing of France, under the name of\nHenry V.\n“I charge Lieutenant General Vis\ncount do Foissac Latour to deliver\nthis letter to you. lie has orders to\nsettle with you the arrangements to he\nmade in favor of the persons who have\naccompanied nic, as well as the ar\nrangements necessary for what con\ncerns me, and the rest of my family.\n“We will afterwards regulate the\nother measures which will be the con\nsequence of the change of the reign.\n“1 repeat to you, my cousin, the\nassurances of the sentiments with\nwhich I am your affectionate cousin,\n“CHARLES.\n“LOUIS ANTOINE.”", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q7758", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q7758", "pers_mentions_list": [ "CHARLES.\n“LOUIS ANTOINE", "the King" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q142", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q142", "loc_mentions_list": [ "France" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states: “Commissioners were sent to Rambouillet to treat with the King…” and provides a dated act of abdication (“Rambouillet August 2, 1830”). This indicates that the king (identified as CHARLES) was physically present in France at Rambouillet on 2 August 1830. Since this date precedes the document’s publication date of 1830‑10‑08, there is explicit evidence that CHARLES was in France before the text was published.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains a date “Rambouillet August 2, 1830,” which falls outside the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (Sep 9 – Oct 8, 1830). The only mention of the person “CHARLES” is at the end of the text with no associated location or date. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that CHARLES was physically present in France within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q7758", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q7758", "pers_mentions_list": [ "CHARLES.\n“LOUIS ANTOINE", "the King" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q191119", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q191119", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Rambouillet" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “Monday, August 2 — Commissioners were sent to Rambouillet to treat with the King…”. This indicates that the king (identified as CHARLES) was physically present in Rambouillet on that date. Since the publication date is 1830‑10‑08 and August 2 falls earlier than this, there is explicit evidence of his presence at the location before the document’s publication.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains a date and place: “Rambouillet August 2, 1830.” This indicates that an event occurred there on 2 August 1830. The signature line ends with “CHARLES,” suggesting Charles signed the act at Rambouillet, but it does not explicitly state that he was physically present in Rambouillet during that date. Moreover, the required time window is from 1830‑09‑08 to 1830‑10‑08 (the 30 days before the publication date of 1830‑10‑08). The only mention of Charles in the text is a signature and does not provide evidence that he was at Rambouillet within this window. Therefore, there is no explicit textual support that CHARLES was present at Rambouillet during the specified period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q7771", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q7771", "pers_mentions_list": [ "the Duke of Orleans, Lieu\ntenant General of the Kingdom" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q191119", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q191119", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Rambouillet" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document reports that commissioners were sent to Rambouillet on August 2, 1830, and that they “treated with the King.” It also notes that a letter is addressed to “my cousin the Duke of Orleans, Lieu tenant General of the Kingdom,” but it does not state that the Duke himself was present at Rambouillet or that he attended the meeting. The only reference to his presence would be an explicit mention such as “the Duke met with the commissioners” or a similar statement. Since no such evidence appears in the text, there is no proof that the Duke of Orleans was physically at Rambouillet before the document’s publication date (1830‑10‑08). Therefore we conclude that the claim cannot be supported.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains the phrase “Rambouillet August , 2, 1830,” which refers to a location and a date that falls outside the required 30‑day window (the window is September 9 – October 8, 1830). The text also mentions “my cousin the Duke of Orleans” but does not provide any explicit statement that he was physically present at Rambouillet during the relevant period. No other date or event in the passage links the Duke of Orleans to Rambouillet within September‑October 1830. Therefore there is no evidence that the person was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q88851", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q88851", "pers_mentions_list": [ "King of France", "Tile Dauphin", "Duke de Bor\ndeaux", "Henry V" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q191119", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q191119", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Rambouillet" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “Commissioners were sent to Rambouillet to treat with the King, and alter some negotiation he consented to abdicate…”. This indicates that the King was physically present in Rambouillet at the time of the negotiations (August 2, 1830). Since the publication date is 1830‑10‑08, this presence occurred before the document’s release. Therefore there is explicit evidence that the person (the King of France) was at Rambouillet prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text states: “Monday, August 2 — Commissioners were sent to Rambouillet to treat with the King.” This indicates the King was physically present in Rambouillet on 2 August 1830. The publication date is 1830‑10‑08; the 30‑day window preceding it runs from 1830‑09‑09 to 1830‑10‑08. Since August 2 falls outside this interval, there is no explicit evidence that any of the listed persons (King of France, Tile Dauphin, Duke de Bor deaux, Henry V) were in Rambouillet within the required timeframe. No other mention places them at Rambouillet during September or early October 1830.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q7771", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q7771", "pers_mentions_list": [ "the Duke of Orleans, Lieu\ntenant General of the Kingdom" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q142", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q142", "loc_mentions_list": [ "France" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document contains a letter dated “Rambouillet August 2, 1830” addressed to “my cousin the Duke of Orleans, Lieu tenant General of the Kingdom.” The phrase “Lieu tenant General of the Kingdom” indicates that the Duke held a French military rank and therefore was physically present in France as part of his duties. This evidence shows he was in France before the document’s publication date (1830‑10‑08).", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text mentions an event in Rambouillet on August 2, 1830, which falls outside the required 30‑day window (September 8 – October 8, 1830). The only reference to “the Duke of Orleans” is a superscription indicating that the document was addressed to him; there is no statement that he himself was physically present in France during the relevant period. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that the person was at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q88851", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q88851", "pers_mentions_list": [ "King of France", "Tile Dauphin", "Duke de Bor\ndeaux", "Henry V" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q142", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q142", "loc_mentions_list": [ "France" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The text reports that “commissioners were sent to Rambouillet to treat with the King” and gives a date of “Rambouillet August 2, 1830.” This indicates that the King was physically present in France at Rambouillet on 2 August 1830, which is well before the document’s publication date of 8 October 1830. Therefore there is explicit evidence that the King (and thus the person listed as “King of France”) was in France prior to the publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains a dated entry “Rambouillet August 2, 1830.” This indicates that the King of France was physically present in Rambouillet (a town in France) on 2 August 1830. The publication date is 1830‑10‑08, so the 30‑day window preceding it runs from 9 September 1830 to 8 October 1830. August 2 falls outside this window (it is earlier than 9 September). However, the text also states that commissioners were sent to Rambouillet “to treat with the King,” implying the King was in France at that time. Since the required presence must be within the specified month before publication, we need a date between 9 Sep and 8 Oct. The only explicit mention of a person’s presence is the August 2 event, which does not satisfy the temporal constraint.\n\nNo other part of the text provides a date in September or October that places any of the listed persons (King of France, Tile Dauphin, Duke de Bor deaux, Henry V) in France. Therefore there is no evidence that any of these individuals were physically present in France within the required 30‑day window.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q16011447", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q16011447", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Lieutenant General Vis\ncount do Foissac Latour" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q191119", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q191119", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Rambouillet" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that “Commissioners were sent to Rambouillet to treat with the King…” and later that “I charge Lieutenant General Vis count do Foissac Latour to deliver this letter to you. He has orders to settle with you the arrangements …”. The wording indicates that the lieutenant general is assigned a task in Rambouillet, implying his physical presence there at some point before the document’s publication date (1830‑10‑08). No contradictory evidence appears; thus we can conclude he was physically present.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text provides a date “Monday, August 2” for an event in Rambouillet, which falls outside the required 30‑day window (1830‑09‑08 to 1830‑10‑08). Moreover, there is no explicit statement that Lieutenant General Vis count do Foissac Latour was physically present at Rambouillet during that period; the only mention of him is a command to deliver a letter. Therefore, the evidence does not satisfy the criteria for presence within the specified timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q16011447", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q16011447", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Lieutenant General Vis\ncount do Foissac Latour" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83020874-1830-10-08-a-i0002_Q142", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q142", "loc_mentions_list": [ "France" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document states that “I charge Lieutenant General Vis count do Foissac Latour to deliver this letter… lie has orders to settle with you the arrangements …” This indicates that the officer was physically present in France at the time of the act (Rambouillet, August 2, 1830) and was tasked with delivering a letter there. Since the publication date is October 8, 1830, this presence occurred well before that date. Therefore we have explicit evidence that Lieutenant General Vis count do Foissac Latour was in France prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains a reference to “Rambouillet August 2, 1830,” which is outside the 30‑day window preceding the publication date of 1830‑10‑08 (the window would be from 1830‑09‑08 to 1830‑10‑08). The only mention of Lieutenant General Vis count do Foissac Latour is a command that he deliver a letter, but the text does not state that he was physically present in France during September or October 1830. No other passage indicates his presence at any French location within the required timeframe. Therefore there is no explicit evidence of his presence in France within the specified period.", "CORRECT": false } ] }, { "document_id": "sn91068761-1960-06-29-a-i0001", "media": { "publication_title": "Tabor City Tribune", "time_period": "1946-1991", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1960-06-29", "language": "en", "text": "SCOUT BASEBALL\nThe Cub Scouts will meet\nagain Friday in Basebball at\nUivitan Field, at 5:30 p. m.\nbast week Bill Grainger's team\ntion over the Mackey Sarvis\nplayers with a srore 3-1 said\nCub Master Richard Gprcion.\nThe puhiir is invited to join\nthe boys in this recreation and\nsportsmanship Gordon added.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-06-29-a-i0001-NIL_bill_grainger", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Bill Grainger" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-06-29-a-i0001-NIL_uivitan_field", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Uivitan Field" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage reports that the Cub Scouts will meet at Uivitan Field on a Friday and mentions “Bill Grainger's team” in relation to a game result, but it does not state that Bill himself was present at the field. The only explicit reference to Bill is his team’s performance; there is no mention of him attending or being at Uivitan Field. Therefore there is no evidence in the text indicating that Bill Grainger was physically present at Uivitan Field before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage mentions “Bill Grainger’s team” and the location “Uivitan Field,” but it does not state that Bill himself was at Uivitan Field on a specific date within the 30‑day window (1960‑05‑30 to 1960‑06‑29). The text only indicates his team participated in an event; there is no explicit evidence of his physical presence. Therefore, we cannot confirm that Bill Grainger was present at Uivitan Field within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-06-29-a-i0001-NIL_cub_master_richard_gprcion", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Cub Master Richard Gprcion" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-06-29-a-i0001-NIL_uivitan_field", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Uivitan Field" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The article reports that “Cub Master Richard Gprcion” stated the outcome of a baseball game played at Uivitan Field (“said Cub Master Richard Gprcion”). The phrasing indicates that he was physically present to make the statement, which typically requires attendance at the site. Since this report is dated before the publication date (1960‑06‑29), it confirms his presence at Uivitan Field prior to that date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that “Cub Scouts will meet again Friday in Basebball at Uivitan Field, at 5:30 p.m.” This indicates a scheduled meeting at the field but does not explicitly say that Cub Master Richard Gprcion was present there. The only mention of him is later as someone who made a comment (“said Cub Master Richard Gprcion”), with no reference to his presence at Uivitan Field or any date within the 30‑day window (1960‑05‑30 to 1960‑06‑29). Since there is no explicit evidence that he was physically present at the location during that period, we cannot confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-06-29-a-i0001-NIL_gordon", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Gordon" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn91068761-1960-06-29-a-i0001-NIL_uivitan_field", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Uivitan Field" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage reports that “Cub Master Richard Gprcion” said the puhiir is invited to join the boys in this recreation and sportsmanship Gordon added. It does not state that Gordon himself was at Uivitan Field, nor does it provide any indication of his presence there. The only mention of the location is the field itself being used for a meeting, but no explicit claim that Gordon attended or was present. Therefore there is no textual evidence that Gordon was physically at Uivitan Field before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document states that the Cub Scouts will meet at Uivitan Field on a Friday, but it does not name any individual present there. The only mention of “Gordon” is in the phrase “sportsmanship Gordon added,” which provides no location or date associated with him. There is no explicit statement indicating that Gordon was at Uivitan Field within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1960‑05‑30 to 1960‑06‑29). Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001", "media": { "publication_title": "Alexandria Gazette & Daily Advertiser", "time_period": "1817-1822", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1820-02-12", "language": "en", "text": "Proposals\nFor Publishing by Subscription f\nTHK SPEECHES\nOF\nCHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq.\nBARRISTER AT LaUx\nCorrectly print'd from the English edition ,\nedited by himself.\nFI'*HE publishers in offering the above work\nA to an enlightened and discriminating\npublic, feel confident of receiving that en\ncouragement which has hitherto been so li*\nberaily bestowed upon ail productions of me\nrit. Among the many orators who have dis\nplayed their eloquence at the bar, both io\nAmerica and in Europe, none have been\nmore successful in touching the finest feel\nings of the heart, an- exciting tke noblest\npassions ot the soul, than Mr. Phillips. Hi*\nspeeches are replete with metaphor, and\npossess, in a great degree ail that felicitoucopiousness ot which the English language\nis so susceptible. Hiseulogiurn on the jin*\nmortal Washington, is ot itself a master\npiece of eloquence, in his character ot Be*\nnaparte , he paints the actions ot that wofl-\nderfui personage in language at once sub*\nlime and imposing : with all the chasttnelft\nand precision of an historian, he recapitu*\nlates bis movements from the cradle to th*\ncamp—trom the camp to the throne—and\nlastly from the elevated station of an em\nperor to that of an exile and captive—there-\niug can be supplied with hand-railing, cut to by confirming a truth, that power unsupport-\nxny dimensions, at a short notice. e d by virtue is liable to wither and decay.—\nHis speeches on the various Crim. Con. cau\nses, vvilJ be read with lively interest by all\nclasses of readers ; and the citizens of this\nrepublic, may, while perusing the immorali\nties and vices of Europeans, rejoice that iq\nthis country such a crime is almost unknown.\nHis speeches on the Emancipation of the\nRoman Catholics oi Ireland, need no «om-\nment—they speak for themselves—and un\nfold to mankind the history of a ()a«s of men,\nvvho, although denied many political and ci\nvil privileges, have always been known to\nbe the friends of th< ir country in times of\ndanger and in b.ittlv.— r ] he. American reacef\nmust view with indignation the various op\npression under which a great portion of that\ngallant and patiiotic people at present labor J\nand fc * ages yet unborn” will lament the ex\nistence of a code which prevents man iron*\nworshiping his Creator according to the dic\ntates ot his oivn conscience.\nr J he publishers, therefore, feeling anima\nted by a desire to present to the American\npublic, specimens of sublime and chaste elo\nquence, which has been so often exerted in»\nthe r ause of benevolence and the noblest\nrights of human nature, with respectful dif\nfidence invite the patronage of all classed\nwho are interested in the display of national;\nsocial, and forensic oratory.\nHAWE k THOMSON,\nAlexandria, (D . C.) Fib- J, J820.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q5081637", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q5081637", "pers_mentions_list": [ "CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq.\nBARRISTER AT LaUx", "Mr. Phillips" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q46", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q46", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Europe" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is a publication titled “THK SPEECHES OF CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq.” It contains the line: “Among the many orators who have dis played their eloquence at the bar, both io America and in Europe, none have been more successful…”. This statement explicitly notes that Mr. Phillips has delivered speeches in Europe, indicating his physical presence there before the document’s publication date of 1820‑02‑12.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document is a publication titled “THK SPEECHES OF CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq.” and contains the sentence: “Among the many orators who have displayed their eloquence at the bar, both io America and in Europe…”. This statement indicates that Mr. Phillips has spoken in Europe, but it provides no specific date or time reference for his presence there. The publication’s own date is 1820‑02‑12, so any mention of a European appearance would need to be dated within the 30‑day window (1820‑01‑12 to 1820‑02‑12). Since no such date appears in the text, there is no explicit evidence that Mr. Phillips was physically present in Europe during that period. Therefore we cannot confirm his presence within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q5081637", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q5081637", "pers_mentions_list": [ "CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq.\nBARRISTER AT LaUx", "Mr. Phillips" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q828", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q828", "loc_mentions_list": [ "America" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document lists “CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq. BARRISTER AT LaUx” and refers to his speeches, but it contains no explicit statement that he was physically present in America at any time before the publication date of 1820‑02‑12. The only reference to a location is “LaUx,” which appears to be a place (likely Lexington) rather than an indication of his presence in the United States. Since there is no mention of him traveling, residing, or being in America within the text, we cannot infer that he was physically present there before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document is a proposal for publishing “THK SPEECHES OF CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq. BARRISTER AT LaUx.” It contains the phrase “both io America and in Europe,” indicating that Mr. Phillips has spoken at the bar in America sometime in the past. However, the text provides no explicit date or time reference for this activity, nor any indication that his presence in America falls within the 30‑day window ending on 1820‑02‑12 (i.e., between 1820‑01‑12 and 1820‑02‑12). Without a specific date or event tied to his presence, we cannot confirm that he was physically present in America within the required timeframe. Therefore the evidence does not satisfy the condition for TRUE classification.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q23", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q23", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Washington" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q46", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q46", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Europe" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is an advertisement for “THK SPEECHES OF CHARLES PHILLIPS” and contains a passage that discusses the subject of George Washington’s life (“Hiseulogiurn on the Jinmortal Washington…”). This passage treats Washington as a historical figure whose speeches are being examined, but it does not provide any indication that Washington himself was physically present in Europe. There is no mention of Washington traveling to or residing in Europe, nor any date or event linking him to that location before the publication’s date (1820‑02‑12). Consequently, there is no evidence in the text that confirms his presence in Europe prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document discusses the speeches of Charles Phillips and mentions “the immortal Washington” as a subject of those speeches. It does not contain any explicit statement that Washington himself was physically present in Europe during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1820‑01‑13 to 1820‑02‑12). No dates, travel references, or location mentions linking Washington to Europe appear in the text. Therefore there is no evidence that Washington was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q23", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q23", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Washington" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q828", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q828", "loc_mentions_list": [ "America" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is a published speech by Charles Phillips, Esq., which contains a passage praising Washington’s life and achievements in the United States. The text references Washington’s deeds (“the immortal Washington”) and his actions in America, but it does not explicitly state that Washington himself was physically present at any location in America before the publication date of 1820‑02‑12. There is no mention of a visit, residence, or event involving Washington in the United States within the text itself. Therefore there is no direct evidence in the document that confirms Washington’s presence in America prior to the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document discusses Mr. Phillips’s speeches on various topics, including one about “the immortal Washington.” It refers to Washington as a historical figure and mentions his actions (“from the cradle to the camp…”) but does not contain any explicit statement that he was physically present in America during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1820‑01‑12 to 1820‑02‑12). The text contains no dates, nor a location reference linking Washington to “America” within that timeframe. Therefore there is no evidence in the document that confirms his presence at the specified location during the required period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q517", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q517", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Be*\nnaparte" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q828", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q828", "loc_mentions_list": [ "America" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document discusses Charles Philipp’s speeches and makes a brief reference to “Washington” but does not name or describe Benjamin Franklin (referred here as “Be*naparte”) being present in America. There is no mention of Franklin traveling, residing, or visiting the United States before the publication date. Consequently, there is no textual evidence that he was physically present at the specified location prior to 1820‑02‑12.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document is a printed publication that discusses the speeches of Charles Phillips and references “Be*naparte” in relation to Washington’s character. It contains no explicit statement indicating that Be*naparte was physically present in America, nor does it provide any date or location tied to his presence within the 30‑day window ending on 1820‑02‑12 (i.e., between 1820‑01‑12 and 1820‑02‑12). The only mention of “America” is in a separate sentence about the American public, not linked to Be*naparte’s presence. Therefore there is no evidence that the person was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q517", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q517", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Be*\nnaparte" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q46", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q46", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Europe" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document discusses THK SPEECHES OF CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq., and references his speeches that were delivered “in Europe.” The only mention of the name “Be*naparte” appears within a sentence describing Washington’s character: “…in his character ot Be*naparte, he paints the actions ot that wofl‑derfui personage in language at once sub‑lime and imposing.” This is an internal reference to Washington’s traits, not evidence of Be*naparte’s physical presence. No other part of the text indicates that Be*naparte himself was in Europe or that he traveled there. Therefore there is no textual support for the claim that Be*naparte was physically present in Europe before the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains a passage that mentions “both io America and in Europe” as referring to speakers who have delivered speeches at the bar. However, this clause does not identify Be*naparte as one of those speakers nor does it state any location or date for his presence. The only reference to Be*naparte is within a sentence describing Phillips’s speech content (“in his character ot Be*naparte”), which provides no evidence that he was physically present in Europe during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1820‑01‑13 to 1820‑02‑12). Since there is no explicit statement linking Be*naparte to a European location within that timeframe, we cannot confirm his presence. Therefore the correct classification is FALSE.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q517", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q517", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Be*\nnaparte" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q57695350", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q57695350", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Ireland" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is a speech by Charles Phillips, Esq., and it discusses his own works and the eloquence of various historical figures, including “Washington” and “Be*naparte.” The only reference to Ireland in the text is the mention that the speaker’s audience includes “the citizens of this republic,” which refers to the United States. There is no statement or implication that Be*naparte (Benjamin Franklin) was physically present in Ireland, nor any date or event linking him to Ireland before 1820‑02‑12. Consequently, there is no evidence supporting his presence at the specified location prior to the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains a reference to “Be*naparte” only in the context of describing Washington’s speeches; there is no mention of him being in Ireland or any other location tied to Ireland. The only Irish‑related phrase is “His speeches on the Emancipation of the Roman Catholics oi Ireland,” which discusses a historical event but does not link Be*naparte to that place. No date or temporal marker places Be*naparte’s presence in Ireland within the 30‑day window ending on 1820‑02‑12 (i.e., between 1820‑01‑13 and 1820‑02‑12). Therefore, there is no explicit evidence that Be*naparte was physically present in Ireland during the required period.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q23", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q23", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Washington" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q57695350", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q57695350", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Ireland" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document discusses Charles Phillips’s speeches and references “the Emancipation of the Roman Catholics in Ireland,” but it does not state that any individual—including “Washington”—was physically present in Ireland at any time before the publication date (1820‑02‑12). The only mention of Washington is a reference to his life and character within a speech, with no indication of travel or presence in Ireland. Therefore there is no evidence supporting the claim that Washington was in Ireland prior to the document’s publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document discusses the speaker’s speeches on various topics, including a reference to “the immortal Washington” and mentions “the Emancipation of the Roman Catholics oi Ireland.” However, there is no explicit statement that Washington himself was physically present in Ireland during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1820‑01‑13 to 1820‑02‑12). The text only alludes to Washington’s speeches or writings; it does not provide any evidence of his presence in Ireland within that timeframe. Therefore, we cannot confirm his physical presence at the specified location and date.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q5081637", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q5081637", "pers_mentions_list": [ "CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq.\nBARRISTER AT LaUx", "Mr. Phillips" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q57695350", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q57695350", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Ireland" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is a printed publication of Charles Phillips’s speeches and includes his title “BARRISTER AT LaUx,” indicating his professional role in the United States, not Ireland. The text contains no mention of Phillips traveling to or being present in Ireland, nor any reference to an event that would place him there before the publication date (1820‑02‑12). Since the only evidence is a professional title and the content of his speeches, there is no indication that he was physically present in Ireland prior to the document’s publication. Therefore we conclude that the claim lacks supporting evidence.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document lists “THK SPEECHES OF CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq.” and notes his barricer status at La X, but it contains no reference to him being in Ireland or any travel there during the relevant timeframe. The only mention of a location is “Alexandria” associated with another individual (HAWE k THOMSON). There are no dates or events that place Charles Phillips in Ireland within 30 days before the publication date (1820‑02‑12). Therefore, there is no explicit evidence that he was physically present at the specified location during the required window.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q517", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q517", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Be*\nnaparte" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q88", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q88", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Alexandria, (D . C.)" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document is a publication listing Charles Philippi’s speeches and includes the line “HAWE k THOMSON, Alexandria, (D . C.) Fib‑ J, J820.” This indicates that the publisher was based in Alexandria, but it does not mention Benjamin Franklin or any other person being present there. The only reference to a person named “Be*naparte” appears in a passage about George Washington’s speeches and contains no indication of his physical presence at Alexandria. Consequently, there is no evidence in the text that Benjamin Franklin was physically present in Alexandria before the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document lists “Alexandria, (D . C.)” as part of an author’s signature line (“HAWE k THOMSON, Alexandria, (D . C.) Fib- J”), but it does not associate the name “Be*naparte” with that location or any event there. The text merely references Be*naparte in a speech about Washington and contains no statement indicating his physical presence at Alexandria during the 30‑day window ending on 1820‑02‑12 (i.e., from 1820‑01‑13 to 1820‑02‑12). Since there is no explicit evidence of Be*naparte’s presence at Alexandria within that timeframe, the correct classification is FALSE.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q23", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q23", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Washington" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q88", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q88", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Alexandria, (D . C.)" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document contains a reference to “Washington” only in the context of his speeches (“Hiseulogiurn on the jin*mortal Washington”), indicating that the author is discussing Washington’s life and deeds, not that he was physically present at Alexandria. The only mention of Alexandria is the address line “HAWE k THOMSON, Alexandria, (D . C.) Fib- J, J820,” which identifies a different individual. There is no sentence or clause linking Washington to being in Alexandria, nor any date indicating his presence there before 1820‑02‑12. Consequently, the text provides no evidence that Washington was physically present at Alexandria prior to the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document contains no explicit statement that “Washington” was physically present at “Alexandria, (D . C.)” within the 30‑day window preceding its publication date (1820‑02‑12). The only mention of Washington is a reference to his speeches and historical analysis (“Hiseulogiurn on the jin* mortal Washington…”), which does not indicate any presence in Alexandria. The location “Alexandria, (D . C.)” appears only with the name HAWE k THOMSON, indicating that person was there, but no connection is made between Washington and that location or timeframe. Therefore there is no textual evidence satisfying the required criteria.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q5081637", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q5081637", "pers_mentions_list": [ "CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq.\nBARRISTER AT LaUx", "Mr. Phillips" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn83026170-1820-02-12-a-i0001_Q88", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q88", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Alexandria, (D . C.)" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The text presents “THK SPEECHES OF CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq. BARRISTER AT LaUx” and later cites a different individual, HAWE k THOMSON, who is listed as residing in Alexandria, (D . C.). There is no mention of Charles Phillips being present or working in Alexandria; the only reference to that location belongs to another person. Therefore there is no evidence that Mr. Phillips was physically present at Alexandria before the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document lists “THK SPEECHES OF CHARLES PHILLIPS, Esq. BARRISTER AT LaUx,” indicating his professional title but not that he was physically present in Alexandria. The only reference to Alexandria is “HAWE k THOMSON, Alexandria, (D . C.) Fib‑J, J820,” which concerns a different individual and provides no indication of Charles Phillips’ presence there. Since the text contains no explicit statement or contextual evidence that Charles Phillips was in Alexandria within the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1820‑01‑13 to 1820‑02‑12), we cannot confirm his physical presence at that location during that period. Therefore, the claim is unsupported.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn92063852-1950-10-28-a-i0011", "media": { "publication_title": "The Detroit Tribune", "time_period": "1935-1966", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1950-10-28", "language": "en", "text": "New YWCA\nCourses\nThree additional courses will\nbe offered by the YWCA in No\nvember when late fall classes\nbegin.\nSkiing and supervised bad\nminton play will be new on the\nlist of class* at Central Branch\nYW. These classes are open to\nboth men and women.\nA class in water ballet will be\na new course offered by the\nHighland Park Branch YWCA.\nThe Dearborn Branch YWCA\nwill offer only one additional\nclass in November. A five weeks\nclass in posture relaxation will\nstart there on Nov. 7.\nClasses opening in November\nat the three other YWCA\nbranches will include bridge,\nchina painting, cookery, roller\nskating, judo, millinery, tennis,\nsquare dancing, golf, bowling,\nmodern dance, swimming and\ngymnastics. All are eight-week\nclasses with the exception of\ngolf and bowling.\nRegistration for these classes\nmay be made at any of the\nWitherell and Montcalm Sts.;\nHighland Park Branch, 13139\nWoodward; and Lucy Thurman\nBranch, 569 East Elizabeth.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-10-28-a-i0011-NIL_witherell_and_montcalm_sts", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Witherell and Montcalm Sts" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-10-28-a-i0011-NIL_lucy_thurman_branch_569_east_elizabeth", "loc_wikidata_QID": null, "loc_mentions_list": [ "Lucy Thurman\nBranch, 569 East Elizabeth" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document lists three distinct locations where registration can be made: “Witherell and Montcalm Sts; Highland Park Branch, 13139 Woodward; and Lucy Thurman Branch, 569 East Elizabeth.” It does not state that Witherell and Montcalm Sts is located at or within the Lucy Thurman Branch address. There is no mention of any person traveling between these places, nor any indication that the two addresses coincide. Therefore there is no evidence in the text that “Witherell and Montcalm Sts” was physically present at the Lucy Thurman Branch before the publication date (1950‑10‑28).", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document lists “Witherell and Montcalm Sts;” as a place where registration may be made, but it does not state that the person (or any entity) was physically present at that address during the relevant timeframe. The only location mentioned in the text is “Lucy Thurman Branch, 569 East Elizabeth,” which appears only as a separate branch name and has no connection to Witherell and Montcalm Sts. There are no dates or events linking these two places within the 30‑day window ending on 1950‑10‑28. Consequently, there is no explicit evidence that “Witherell and Montcalm Sts” was present at Lucy Thurman Branch during that period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-10-28-a-i0011-NIL_witherell_and_montcalm_sts", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Witherell and Montcalm Sts" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-10-28-a-i0011_Q1144544", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1144544", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Highland Park Branch, 13139\nWoodward", "Highland Park Branch YWCA" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states that registration for classes may be made at “any of the Witherell and Montcalm Sts.; Highland Park Branch, 13139 Woodward; and Lucy Thurman Branch.” This indicates that these are locations where one can register, but it does not provide any indication that the person (Witherell and Montcalm Sts) was physically present at the Highland Park Branch. There is no mention of attendance, visits, or any event involving the person at that address before the publication date. Therefore there is no evidence supporting the claim.", "isAt": "TRUE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": false, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document lists “Witherell and Montcalm Sts” as one of the places where registration may be made, but it does not state that this person was physically present at Highland Park Branch (13139 Woodward) during the 30‑day window ending on 1950‑10‑28. No sentence in the text connects “Witherell and Montcalm Sts” to that branch or provides a date of presence within the required timeframe. Therefore there is no explicit evidence that the person was present at the specified location during the relevant period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-10-28-a-i0011-NIL_witherell_and_montcalm_sts", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "Witherell and Montcalm Sts" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn92063852-1950-10-28-a-i0011_Q430464", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q430464", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Dearborn Branch YWCA" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document lists “Witherell and Montcalm Sts.” as places where class registration can be made, but it does not state that these streets are located at or within the Dearborn Branch YWCA. The text only mentions the Dearborn Branch in the context of offering a posture‑relaxation class; there is no indication that Witherell and Montcalm Sts were physically present there. Therefore, there is no evidence in the document that the location “Witherell and Montcalm Sts” was at the Dearborn Branch YWCA before the publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The text lists “Witherell and Montcalm Sts” as places where registration may be made, but it does not state that anyone named or identified by those street names was physically present at the Dearborn Branch YWCA. Moreover, there is no date associated with any such presence within the 30‑day window ending on 1950‑10‑28. Therefore, there is no explicit evidence in the document that the person (identified as “Witherell and Montcalm Sts”) was present at the specified location during the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn88085488-1910-02-18-a-i0006", "media": { "publication_title": "Pullman Herald", "time_period": "1888-1989", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-test-en.tsv", "date": "1910-02-18", "language": "en", "text": "Della Pringle Coining\nThe famous Della Pringle company\nwill commence a five nights engage\nment in The Auditorium Monday, \\\nFeb. 21. .Miss Pringle is supported by\nC. K. Van Auker, and absolutely the\nstrongest company of players in the \\\nwest. Seventy straight weeks in t\nBoise is the record breaking “run” j\nof this splendid organization, and'\nnot one single failure. Miss Pringle j\nhas selected “The Man on the Box”\nfor the opening play, to be followed\nby “Peaceful Valley,” \"Flora May's\nDutchman,” \"Married Life,” and the\nLewis Morrison version of the won\nderful play “Faust.”\nMiss Pringle carries complete sce\nnic and electrical effects for “Faust\"\nand a correct and perfect perform\nance is promised. Many pleasing spe\ncialties are introduced each night,\nand a handsome diamond ring will\nbe given away Friday night.\nPopular prices 2 5, 3 5 and 50 cents\nwill prevail. Tickets at Watt’s Phar\nmacy.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-02-18-a-i0006-NIL_c_k_van_auker", "pers_wikidata_QID": null, "pers_mentions_list": [ "C. K. Van Auker" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-02-18-a-i0006_Q35775", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q35775", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Boise" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage notes that “Miss Pringle is supported by C. K. Van Auker” and that the company has a record‑breaking run in Boise. However, it does not state that Van Auker himself was physically present in Boise; it only indicates his support role and the location of the company’s activities. No other part of the text provides any indication of Van Auker’s presence at Boise before the publication date (1910‑02‑18). Therefore there is no direct evidence that he was physically in Boise.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document mentions C. K. Van Auker as a supporter of Miss Pringle but does not state that he was physically present in Boise during the 30‑day window ending on 1910‑02‑18. The only reference to Boise is “Seventy straight weeks in Boise,” which refers to the company’s activity, not Van Auker’s presence there. Since no explicit evidence of his presence in Boise within the required timeframe exists, we cannot confirm that he was physically present at the location during that period.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-02-18-a-i0006_Q18351054", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q18351054", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Miss Pringle", "Della Pringle" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-02-18-a-i0006_Q35775", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q35775", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Boise" ], "at": "TRUE", "SYS_at": "TRUE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage states, “Seventy straight weeks in Boise is the record breaking ‘run’ of this splendid organization…” This indicates that Miss Pringle has been physically present in Boise for a continuous period of 70 weeks. Since 70 weeks is roughly one year, and the document’s publication date is 1910‑02‑18, she must have already been in Boise well before that date. Therefore there is explicit evidence of her presence at the specified location prior to the publication.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document notes that “Seventy straight weeks in Boise is the record breaking ‘run’ of this splendid organization,” indicating the company’s presence or activity in Boise during that period. However, it does not explicitly state that Miss Pringle herself was physically present in Boise; it only mentions her involvement with the company and her selection of plays. Since there is no direct evidence linking Miss Pringle to a physical presence in Boise within the 30‑day window before the publication date (1910‑02‑18), we cannot confirm her presence at that location.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-02-18-a-i0006_Q6913937", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q6913937", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Lewis Morrison" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn88085488-1910-02-18-a-i0006_Q35775", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q35775", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Boise" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The document describes the Della Pringle company’s upcoming performance schedule and notes that Miss Pringle has selected a “Lewis Morrison version of the wonderful play ‘Faust.’” It also mentions Boise as the location for the five‑night engagement, but it does not state that Lewis Morrison himself was physically present in Boise. The text only indicates his involvement (i.e., he wrote or performed a version) and does not provide any evidence of his presence at the venue before the publication date. Therefore there is no explicit indication that Lewis Morrison was in Boise prior to 1910‑02‑18.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document discusses the Della Pringle Company’s upcoming performance and notes that “Lewis Morrison” is providing a version of *Faust*. However, it does not state that Lewis Morrison himself was physically present in Boise, nor does it provide any date or time reference linking his presence to Boise within the 30‑day window ending on 1910‑02‑18. The only location mentioned is “Boise” as a city where the company’s record run occurs, but no explicit statement ties Lewis Morrison to that location during the relevant period. Therefore there is no evidence in the text confirming his presence at Boise within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": true } ] }, { "document_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003", "media": { "publication_title": "The Delaware Gazette", "time_period": "1805-1810", "source_type": "Newspaper" }, "source": "v2.1/hipe2020/en/HIPE-2022-v2.1-hipe2020-dev-en.tsv", "date": "1810-03-28", "language": "en", "text": "Of Burr —Letters from Paris of the close of the\nlast year (says the Aurora) mention that some spe\nculators who made a dash in the U. States, with the\nmoney brought from the British treasury, to support\nBurr’s conspiracy, found their way into a house of\ncorrection in that city.\nIt is a curions circumstance that the money issued\nby the British treasury to sustain Burr should go thro’\nthis process— Issued in L ondon to an accredited a-\ngene of Burr / the money invested in British dry goods\nand imported in several ships to the United States\nthe proceeds employed in purchasing vast estates i„\nPhiladelphia and neighborhood ; a credit raised on\nthe property, securing bills of credit on Paris; the\nhills of credit employed in purchesing a vast quantity\nof captured German and Prussian arms for the culti\nvation of Ouachita lauds-the intention of the arms\ndiscovered, tho whole seized, the agent a secret : th**\narms confiscated, the estates purchased go tlire ugh\nrhe hands of the sheriff. What will he the next con-\n-.a time alone has yet to reveal.", "sampled_pairs": [ { "pers_entity_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003_Q179090", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q179090", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Burr" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003_Q90", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q90", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Paris" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage refers to “Letters from Paris” and mentions that money was issued in London to an accredited agent of Burr. It does not state that Burr himself traveled to or visited Paris; it only indicates correspondence originating from Paris. Therefore there is no explicit textual evidence that Burr was physically present in Paris before the document’s publication date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage refers to “Letters from Paris” but does not explicitly state that Burr himself was in Paris during the relevant period (the 30‑day window ending on 1810‑03‑28). The only mention of a date is “close of the last year,” which falls well outside the required timeframe. No other sentence indicates Burr’s presence in Paris within that month, so there is no direct evidence to satisfy the condition.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003_Q179090", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q179090", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Burr" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003_Q30", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q30", "loc_mentions_list": [ "United States", "U. States" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The excerpt discusses “speculators who made a dash in the U. States” and notes that they carried money to support Burr’s conspiracy, but it does not state that Burr himself was physically present in the United States. The text only references Burr as the subject of the conspiracy; there is no mention of Burr traveling or being in the U.S. before the document’s publication date (1810‑03‑28). Therefore there is no evidence in the passage indicating that Burr was at the specified location prior to that date.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage discusses “speculators who made a dash in the U. States” and mentions that they were using money to support Burr’s conspiracy, but it does not state that Burr himself was physically present in the United States during the 30‑day window preceding the publication date (1810‑02‑27 to 1810‑03‑28). There is no explicit mention of Burr being there or a date tied to his presence. Therefore, we cannot confirm that Burr was present at the specified location within the required timeframe.", "CORRECT": false }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003_Q179090", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q179090", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Burr" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003_Q84", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q84", "loc_mentions_list": [ "L ondon" ], "at": "FALSE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": true, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage notes that “money … Issued in London to an accredited agent of Burr,” indicating that the funds were dispatched from London to a representative, but it provides no indication that Burr himself was physically present in London at any time before 1810‑03‑28. The text only references the location of the issuance and the role of an agent; there is no mention of Burr traveling or being in London. Therefore there is no evidence supporting his presence.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The passage notes that money was “issued in London” to an accredited agent of Burr, but it does not state that Burr himself was physically present in London during the relevant period. No explicit mention of Burr’s presence, a date, or any event linking him to London within 30 days before the publication date (1810‑02‑27 to 1810‑03‑28) is found. Therefore there is no direct evidence that Burr was in London during that window.", "CORRECT": true }, { "pers_entity_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003_Q179090", "pers_wikidata_QID": "Q179090", "pers_mentions_list": [ "Burr" ], "loc_entity_id": "sn82014385-1810-03-28-a-i0003_Q1345", "loc_wikidata_QID": "Q1345", "loc_mentions_list": [ "Philadelphia" ], "at": "PROBABLE", "SYS_at": "FALSE", "CORRECT_at": false, "SYS_at_explanation": "The passage discusses “Letters from Paris” and mentions that some speculators who supported Burr’s activities were present in a house of correction in Philadelphia. It also notes that the money was used to purchase estates in Philadelphia, but it does not state that Burr himself visited or was physically present there. There is no mention of Burr traveling to or residing in Philadelphia before the document’s publication date (1810‑03‑28). Therefore, there is no evidence supporting his presence at the location.", "isAt": "FALSE", "SYS_isAt": "FALSE", "CORRECT_isAt": true, "SYS_isAt_explanation": "The document references “Burr” only as a subject of letters from Paris and mentions Philadelphia in the context of estates purchased by others; it does not state that Burr himself was physically present in Philadelphia during the 30‑day window ending on 1810‑03‑28. No explicit mention of Burr’s presence or an event involving him at that location within that timeframe is found. Therefore, there is no evidence to confirm his presence.", "CORRECT": false } ] } ]